Jehovah's Witnesses' "disfellowshipping" examined in Psychiatric Journal. "How Religious Shunning Ruins Lives".

by Balaamsass2 12 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Balaamsass2
    Balaamsass2

    ?? If it is illegal for minors to get married, enter into contracts, drink, and smoke, why is it legal for them to enter into lifelong religious contracts they can not break without family shunning and community ostracism????

    How Religious Shunning Ruins Lives

    A form of institutionalized estrangement, shunning hurts health of the excluded.

    Updated March 27, 2024 |Psychology Today Magazine

    KEY POINTS

    • Religious shunning is a social death penalty that results in long-term detrimental effects on mental health.
    • The brain registers exclusion as physical pain that cuts deeper and lasts longer than bodily injury.
    • Ostracism instigates actions to recover thwarted needs of belonging, self‐esteem, and a meaningful existence.
    • Over one million disfellowshipped (shunned) Jehovah's Witnesses are alive today—10 percent of active members.

    A former member of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Josh Caswell Sr., reached out to me after reading one of my posts about estrangement. He asked that I explore the policy practiced in some religions of shunning.

    In religious communities, shunning means cutting ties with members—even family—who don’t explicitly follow religious beliefs and the leaders’ demands or who wish to break with their religion. Religious shunning is a form of institutionalized estrangement and emotional abuse.

    Shunning is widely practiced among certain religions—including the Jehovah's Witnesses, the Church of Scientology, the Amish, and Orthodox Judaism—to control the conduct of its members. A silent form of bullying and rejection, the practice—more common among cult-like denominations—ensures that the identity of a collective group does not tolerate individual thinking.

    The Watchtower, the official Jehovah’s Witnesses magazine, reports that 1 in every 100 Jehovah's Witnesses is “disfellowshipped” each year—a total of more than 80,000. Of these, fully two-thirds will not be reinstated. This means that more than 1 million disfellowshipped Jehovah's Witnesses are alive today who are being shunned—more than 10 percent of the number of active Jehovah's Witnesses.

    One man's personal journey after shunning

    “I was raised a Jehovah’s Witness in Massachusetts,” says Caswell, 45, who now lives in Arizona and works as a diagnostics specialist for Pep Boys auto services.

    “In my 20s,” he says, “I ‘faded out’ of religion. I felt it was too restrictive and didn’t allow me to be a human being. The cost was losing all my family and friends.”

    That’s a high price to pay for being human. Recent studies show that shunning has a long-term, detrimental effect on mental health, job possibilities, and life satisfaction. Intense loneliness and a feeling of loss of control over one’s life are common after leaving. The culture of informing on other members inside the Jehovah's Witnesses also leads to a continued sense of distrust and suspicion long after leaving.

    “The religion teaches that if someone decides to leave the religion,” explains Caswell, “the entire congregation—including family members—shuns that person by not talking to them and avoiding them as much as possible. My family has shunned me for over 25 years. I know first-hand that the result is devastating.”

    Research has shown that shunned individuals often experience feelings of depression, helplessness, hopelessness, low self-esteem, suicide ideation, and self-harming behaviors. That’s certainly what happened to Caswell.

    “I was very smart in school. I was taking 11th-grade subjects when I was in 9th grade. I had a full scholarship to MIT, but I wasn’t able to go to college because that’s not something they believe in. Why waste your time going to college when the end of the world is just around the corner? I was forced to give up that educational opportunity.”

    Caswell says that pursuing any career was discouraged because religious leaders preferred that potential husbands devote their time to the church, as elders in the congregation, or as pioneers who preach some 90 hours a month. To protect these priorities, he was allowed to date only within the congregation.

    At 17, Caswell left the religion. He says his father, an elder in the congregation, had raped six of his eight sisters. The church said it would handle the abuse internally, but his father was disfellowshipped for only a month before being reinstated. He believes his mother orchestrated the sexual abuse.

    “I honored my parents when I was living with them,” he says. “But I was never happy. So I set forth to find out who I was.”

    By the time Caswell was 20, everyone in the congregation, including three sisters, had stopped communicating with him. In abandoning his religion, Caswell left a safe “bubble”—but he knew nothing of the outside world. Consequently, he went from one extreme to another, following a dangerous path on which he drank to excess and used crystal meth. Eventually, he became suicidal and ended up living in his car.

    For the last 19 years, he has been clean. However, he has had no relationship with his mother or other family members for decades. His father passed away years ago; they were estranged at the time of his death.

    Studies on ostracism

    Humans have a primal need for social support. Without a sense of belonging—a feeling of emotional safety and context—people come to fear that their very lives are at risk. They lose the ability to trust and connect with others, instead becoming consumed by the task of surviving alone.

    Shunning, therefore, is like a social death penalty—and studies prove this point. Exclusion has been found to cause pain that cuts deeper and lasts longer than a physical injury, according to Dr. Kipling D. Williams, a distinguished professor of psychological sciences at Purdue University who is noted for his unique studies of ostracism.

    When someone is shunned—even by a stranger, even only briefly—Dr. Williams has found that they experience a strong and harmful reaction, activating the same area of the brain that registers physical pain. The crucial difference between physical and psychic injury is that physical damage heals, while social injuries linger. In his studies of more than 5,000 people, Dr. Williams used a computer game to show how just two or three minutes of ostracism can produce ongoing negative feelings.

    “Our studies indicate that the initial reaction to ostracism is pain,” he explains, “which is similarly felt by all individuals regardless of personality or social/situational factors. Ostracism then instigates actions aimed at recovering thwarted needs of belonging, self‐esteem, control and meaningful existence.”

    Caswell, who asked me to use his real name because he wants his voice heard, says that religious leaders know full well the profound psychological impact of shunning. “That’s exactly why they do it,” he says. “Shunning is not love; it’s how Jehovah’s Witnesses discipline members. It’s a form of punishment.”

    References

    Williams, Kipling D., NidaView, Steve (2014) Ostracism and Public Policy, Sage Journals, Volume 1, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/237273221454975

    Harper, Janice (2011) A Reason (and Season) to Stop Shunning, HuffPost, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/a-reason-and-season-to-st_b_1146103

    Luther, Rosie (2022) What Happens to Those Who Exit Jehovah's Witnesses: An Investigation of the Impact of Shunning, National Library of Medicine, PubMed

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/brothers-sisters-strangers/202403/how-religious-shunning-ruins-lives#:~:text=Religious%20shunning%20is%20a%20form,the%20conduct%20of%20its%20members.
  • NotFormer
    NotFormer

    This is great! The more the mainstream media notices these bastards (WT GB), the more government attention will be attracted and hopefully more pressure will be brought to bear, reducing what the arseholes can get away with.

  • Sea Breeze
    Sea Breeze

    I'd say way more than one million people are affected by some form of shunning from exposure to WT theology.

    Other than that, great article. I wished we had some data on suicides and deaths caused from alcohol and drug use by former members. That would be more reflective of the actual pain experienced. Only God knows the true cost to society when you include the bad name JW's give to Christians in general.

    Coeur d'Alene Press

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    One small step closer to the Org losing its tax-exemption in yet another part of the world.

  • Balaamsass2
    Balaamsass2

    As society and the medical establishment become more aware of the actual harm of Disfellowshipping I see another financial drain on Watchtower. Lawsuits for "Intentional infliction of emotional distress" following their defamation for simply leaving the organization.

    https://www.fightingforyou.com/resource-center/articles/can-you-sue-for-emotional-distress/

    https://www.injuryjusticeattorney.com/mental-emotional-injuries

    "

    WHAT IS INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS?

    IIED is a type of intentional tort that occurs when one person commits outrageous actions for the intended purpose of causing another person to experience severe emotional distress.

    The emotional distress caused by the outrageous behavior may manifest in physical symptoms such as insomnia, headaches, and stomach problems, or it may result in mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and extreme fear.

    Severe emotional distress may include feelings of suffering, anguish, shock, grief, fright, humiliation, anxiety/worry, and more.

    Most notably, you don't have to experience any physical injury to sue for IIED or prove conclusively that the defendant intended to harm you. Instead, you only need to show that the actions were intentional and that you suffered as a result.

    HOW CAN YOU PROVE IIED?

    There are different elements your California attorney must prove in an intentional tort lawsuit to recover damages for IIED:

    • The defendant's conduct was “outrageous.” The outrageous actions must be considered outside the bounds of decency;
    • The defendant was willful and intentional in their behavior. They either intended to cause you emotional distress or acted with reckless disregard for your well-being;
    • You suffered severe emotional distress due to the defendant's conduct. In other words, your emotional distress must be more than just an annoyance or hurt feelings—it must be severe distress, meaning it must be profound or long-lasting to the point that no reasonable person should be expected to endure it;

    The different factors that are considered to determine whether the defendant's conduct was outrageous include the following:

    • Whether the defendant abused their position of authority or a relationship giving them the power to impact your interest;
    • Whether they were aware that you were especially vulnerable to emotional distress;
    • Whether they knew their conduct would most likely result in some emotional harm.

    As noted, you are not required to prove physical injury to recover damages for severe emotional distress. Damages are usually covered in cases where you have high medical bills, lost wages, lost earning capacity, or other compensatory damages.

    You are allowed to recover punitive damages in cases of recklessness and intentional wrongdoing. Since intentional infliction cases require outrageous conduct, they are more likely to result in an award for punitive damages.

    IIED IN THE CONTEXT OF OTHER OFFENSES

    Intentional infliction of emotional distress can be filed as a lawsuit on its own. Still, IIED lawsuits are often filed in addition to other offenses (both criminal and civil) that may have caused other types of damage. Common instances where it might be appropriate to file an additional IIED suit include:

    • Cases of sexual abuse or assault;
    • Retaliation for whistleblowing;
  • Bill Covert
    Bill Covert

    IIED, cool

    Thanks! I am currently in negotiations with the local Indian Casino on 4 parcels of real estate that separates a major development in the works from freeway interchange access. Price somewhere north of $1M.

    I have been waiting 20 years for this scenario. Everyone of the letters included in the 2013 summer talk "Human Apostates" has centered on the Sept.1 1987 Wt. article "A Time to Speak When?" as to how it relates to two court cases; a $4.250M unregistered securities swindle and the defrauding of a widow. And on the cowardice of elders in the face of "wolves" Acts 20.

    If and when those properties go into escrow this should be enough to bring some cowardly hearts to shut down. When Norway court case finished I dropped off the case and a letter advising the elders they should consider see their insurance agents as to getting personal liability insurance. They can't say they were not warned.

  • TxNVSue2023
    TxNVSue2023

    I've always thought it would be better for the Org to require a minimum age for baptism. Whatever age that you legally become an adult in whatever country you live in. It's a major adult decision & life long commitment.

    Hopefully this will be one of the new changes coming down the pike.

  • TonusOH
    TonusOH

    At the least, they should make it a policy to discourage young people from getting baptized. But that runs counter to their narrative, because they just love it when a very young person gets baptized. They feel that it's a good look, and it also pressures anyone else who isn't baptized ('if this young person can dedicate himself to Jehovah, what is holding you back?').

    I don't think outsiders are very impressed by it, but the rank-and-file eat that stuff up.

  • Biahi
    Biahi

    It is true, they have no business baptizing minors, but if they stop doing it, baptisms will drop down to near zero. And they will have lost their ability to ‘trap’ yang wans. Perhaps if they separated baptism with membership, which they would need to “officially join”, in adulthood. I got baptized in a Christian church, and I was not a member until, much later, I filled out a church form, requesting membership. Basically, the form was simple, just name, address, name of spouse and children. Then the form asked if I had accepted Christ as my personal savior. I answered yes. The following Sunday, the pastor indicated to everyone there that I had requested church membership. He asked the congregation to accept me as a member with a hearty “AMEN”. They did.

  • Balaamsass2

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit