CCJW is one of 8 or 9 corporations in the US that is used by the US branch office
Then there is one that owns the cemetery and Walkill.....RO
LOL!!!!!..
The WBT$ doesn`t have much faith in their "New System"..
.....
Every JW`s Final Home..
Maddox v Integro USA, Inc, et al
by Richard Oliver 20 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
OUTLAW
-
snowbird
The suit was brought by her children on the grounds that WT actively encouraged their parent to attend the convention - which is true.
However, WT slithered right out of that one.
Sylvia
-
Richard Oliver
Sorry I meant to write. Cemetary at Walkill not Cemetary and Walkill.
-
snowbird
Incidentally, the Mitchell Center is the namesake of a very wealthy family who offers college scholarships to Alabama's best and brightest.
My daughter was a recipient, though a zealous JW.
Sylvia
-
dubstepped
And neither the Mitchells nor the WT should be held liable for someone falling down the stairs unless something was done wrong to cause it. People today just look for deep pockets and hope to get a payoff for unfortunate events. Unless someone pushed her or a step gave way or somehow they caused her to fall there's nobody at fault but the person that fell, and it unfortunately had catastrophic results.
I'm all for tying the WT up in any way possible and wasting their resources, but this one is a stretch.
-
WHATSGOINGON
What makes me sick is that they are so sneaky with all their different corporations using anything legal to wriggle out of any sticky situations they find themselves in, they use legalise to avoid obeying the superior authorities which stand in place by God.
-
snowbird
I believe it's called Theocratic Warfare.
Sylvia
-
OUTLAW
Sorry I meant to write. Cemetary at Walkill not Cemetary and Walkill.....RO
Don`t be sorry, that's even better!..LOL!!!!
-
Pete Zahut
And neither the Mitchells nor the WT should be held liable for someone falling down the stairs unless something was done wrong to cause it
Whether or not they should be held liable isn't the part that concerns me. The hard part for me to overlook is the fact that they distanced themselves from the local brothers who ran the assembly. It reminds me of how they seem to distance themselves from the elders who make a mistake or do something wrong while acting in their behalf. The Australian Hearings come to mind.
-
dubstepped
I agree that it's an issue that the dubs are so broken up. It's a move to displace responsibility and funds in such a way that their liability is limited, and it is disgusting. They did all kinds of this in Australia from what I understand so that they don't have to pay for anything. It probably is legal though. It just shows that the dubs have no ethics and morals and only care about protecting that almighty dollar, their real savior. That is concerning, but nothing new. That isn't necessarily what the thread was about either. I get the issues with it though.