I do buy that flight 93 was blown out of the sky by the US. Hell, if I had to make that kind of decision, 66 people against the hundreds or thousands they could kill if they crashed into a populated area, then I would have had flight 93 shot down, too. That one just makes sense. People remember hearing a sonic boom in the area of flight 93's crash point. Now, any one of our more powerful planes could have gotten there in minutes, and shot the plane down. This is just a good-sense call, although a terrible one to make. No wonder that the country would rather believe that it was brought down by heroes rather than our own government.
Still, I watched a program about how the Towers fell. From the program, it showed that it was a structural flaw (not preparing for this type of attack) that lent to the fall. Basically, it was just a mass buttress failure-----too-small screws holding up a big, big building. The towers falling is not a conspiracy.
As for the pentagon, you can see footage of a plane hitting....they played it on CNN over and over. It was a parking lot camera that caught the plane crashing. If that was faked, they must've hired Steven Spielberg for the job.
Now, while I have deep reservations about us being in Iraq, I don't believe for one minute that we deliberatly brought down the towers....I can buy that we were lax in our security (obviously). Now, that makes sense.
ash