Hello Funky,
Sorry to hear that your family is going through this trauma.
I have for some while been collecting names of persons who killed themselves as a result of the 'shunning' process and I make clear the term 'shunning' as opposed to 'disfellowshipping'.
It has to be stated, that the WTS has continually won its legal battles regarding this issue. In recent times Farkel posted the results of a court case in which the JW father involved was lambasted for his actions in carrying out the WTS doctrine of DF where his estranged wife was concerned. This was a specific case though, in specific circumstances and unlikely to make any long term change to the WTS policy.
It seems to me that the Courts, who are very squeamish about setting precedents over the issues of a religions right to impose its own ecclesiastical punishment over its adherents, do not understand the differences between ‘disfellowshipping’ and ‘shunning’. Shunning is used by the WTS as a lethal weapon, not as an internal system to maintain and protect its high moral standards.
If a case of suicide could be clearly shown to have resulted from the cruel practice of ‘shunning’, I believe that the WTS would be successfully sued. The problem is that such evidence will likely need to be in written form, such as a suicide note, or correspondence that shows the gradual descent of the shunned person into a depression from which they were unable to survive. If any on this Board have such evidence, I would certainly be very interested in hearing about it.
The only way that the WTS changes its anti-social behavior is when it is imposed upon them by the Courts, who though controlled by Satan seem to be far more interested in justice and honor than those controlled by God!
The policy of shunning will gradually change as society changes. Theological evolution will transform it into a more sanitized vehicle by natural progress of time, though of course the WTS will claim that God made them change. We might certainly speed up this process, and uncover some compensation for those who have been left without bread-winners, or children who have to grow up without mothers if we challenged the WTS with such evidence.
Take care Derek - HS