Michio Kaku: can universes form from "nothing" ?

by Brokeback Watchtower 9 years ago 26 Replies latest 9 years ago jw friends

• 

  cyberjesus 9 years ago

  Kaku must be stupid cuz in too stupid to understand him.

  Link
• 

  shepherdless 9 years ago

  I woke up this morning with a feeling I wrote something silly on this thread, last night. I deserve the mockery.

  Anyway, OneEyedJoe makes the point I was trying to make.

  Link +2 / -0
• 

  Oubliette 9 years ago

  shepherdless: As a result of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity ...
  

  No. Theories are well-supported explanations of how things are. Reality does not conform to our tentative attempts to explain them, nothing that happened billions of years ago is the "result" of what any humans--no matter how smart--say today or in the extremely recent past, say 1879 - 1955.

  Link
• 

  Oubliette 9 years ago

  shepherdless: I woke up this morning with a feeling I wrote something silly on this thread, last night. I deserve the mockery.

  Don't post when you drink. Only post when you think.

  Link
• 

  Brokeback Watchtower 9 years ago

  Kaku must be stupid cuz in too stupid to understand him.

  In order to understand him and really get it one would need a good back round in Physics, so it takes a small leap of faith in his credentials as a educator for the majority of us to get some idea that he knows what he is talking about.

  .

  Link
• 

  Brokeback Watchtower 9 years ago

  Link
• 

  prologos 9 years ago

  It appears, that whenever "nothing" is discussed in the beginning of the universe context, it turns out, not to be an empty nothing, but filled with all kinds of neat phenomenae, even time..

  Link
• 

  Brokeback Watchtower 9 years ago

  Nothing is very unstable.

  Link
• 

  prologos 9 years ago

  The moment nothing is something, how can it be said that it is still nothing? , or ever was ?

  Link
• 

  Brokeback Watchtower 9 years ago

  That's the big semantical question what the hell is nothing?

  Link