A jury acquits Jehovah’s Witness in PA.

by was a new boy 16 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • was a new boy
    was a new boy

    Trial of Lancaster city Jehovah’s Witness member accused of molestation begins

    Jose Antonio Serrano 10272022

    Jose Antonio Serrano

    Lancaster County Prison

    Editor's note: A jury acquitted Serrano on Tuesday. Also, the name of Serrano's daughter has been removed from this article to protect her privacy.

    The daughter of a Jehovah’s Witness elder told a Lancaster County Court jury Monday that her father sexually abused her for five years in the 1990s when she was a young child.

    The daughter testified that her father, Jose A. Serrano, 70, of the 400 block of Poplar Street in Lancaster, molested her from the time she was 3 years old until she was 8.

    LNP | LancasterOnline typically does not identify alleged victims of sexual assault, however the AG's office said Serrano's daughter had agreed to be identified.

    The attorney general charged Serrano in 2022 along with three other Jehovah’s Witness elders from other Pennsylvania counties. He is charged with aggravated indecent assault and two related offenses.

    In his opening statement, Deputy Attorney General Zach Wynkoop, the lead prosecutor, painted a picture of a child who was abused by her family. Her father would molest her, and her mother, who Wynkoop said knew about the abuse, would not protect her. They homeschooled when she reached third grade, isolating her from other kids.

    Wynkoop said the daughter repeatedly told authorities about being molested by her father, calling Lancaster Children and Youth Services to report physical abuse at age 13, and later, as an adult, talking to Lancaster city police.

    Serrano’s public defender, Samuel Encarnacion, portrayed the daughter as vengeful, saying she had “waged a war” against her father, trying to incriminate him multiple times over the years.

    Serrano attempted to poke holes in the daughter's testimony, saying she did not report any sexual abuse when she called Children and Youth and only took her accusations to police 18 years after the alleged abuse ended. He also said she failed to get a protection from abuse order against her parents in Maryland, where she lives.

    In her testimony, the daughter corroborated Wynkoop’s timeline of events and said she remembered Serrano molesting her on five occasions. She said she did not tell Children and Youth about the sexual abuse when she called as a teenager because she wanted to see how seriously her allegations of physical abuse would be taken.

    “I didn’t think anyone would believe me,” the daughter testified.

    The daughter said she approached police after spending time with a therapist and remembering the abuse from a repressed memory.

    Encarnacion said the daughter's story has changed over the years, including new details and allegations she did not cite when she initially talked to police.

    Encarnacion showed the daughter was not honest about her age when she went to police and was inconsistent in reporting how many times she was abused.

    Judge Thomas Sponaugle is overseeing the trial, which is expected to run through Wednesday.

    According to court records and newspaper archives, Serrano pleaded guilty in 1993 to two counts of indecent assault involving two girls, 13 and 15, in Willow Street, in 1992. He was placed on probation for five years and ordered to pay the girls’ medical and counseling costs and was required to attend a sex offenders program.

    https://lancasteronline.com/news/local/trial-of-lancaster-city-jehovah-s-witness-member-accused-of-molestation-begins/article_02a830be-84fa-11ef-b70f-d7ca70a020b1.html

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    Please give us the outcome of this Trial when you have it, thanks. And if you could please Post the info. yourself, as you have in the O.P, as accessing lancaster online seems not to be possible from the U.K.

  • stan livedeath
    stan livedeath

    i'll share 2 real life stories on this subject.

    !: i knew a chap who was a clergyman--in other words a real life minister of religion ( Not a phoney JW "minister"). Someone from his past went to the police here in the UK--and accused the clergyman of sexual abuse when he was a boy. The police took the case to court--and the minister was found guilty--and went to prison. He is now out--and i bumped into him last year.

    2: years back, i knew a man who was the caretaker of a building i worked in. He and his wife had fostered a number of children over the years. One disturbed child accused the man of molesting her--and the case went to court--he "pleaded" GUILTY and went to prison.

    After he served his time he went back to his care taker job. NOBODY believed he was guilty. I got talking to him--and he told me he was advised by his lawyer to plead guilty to get a shorter sentence. So he did.

    This has bought it home to me--ANY OF US could end up in this same mess.

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    Any J.W is quite likely to, as the Org. still refuses to institute an actual Active Working Programme of Protecting the Vulnerable*, and hence have left it open for perverts to do there evil deeds, of even an innocent J.W to be accused, because she or he was alone with a vulnerable person at some time.

    * Such programmes are in place and working in all major Organisations in the U.K, and even little local ones, including small Clubs etc. Why not in the J.W Org ?

    Perhaps they wish to keep their Label of the "Paedophile's Paradise".

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    Guy looks like a fucking thug.

  • stan livedeath
    stan livedeath

    a thug in good standing

  • blondie
    blondie

    Actually, the government can find a jw sexual predator guilty, give them a long prison sentence; and the congregation elders will let that person stay in the congregation if they admit their "sin" and "repent" as if sexual predators won't prey again. I have seen it happen in several occasions in the media when the WTS is asked why they stay approved in the congregation. Scary, right! The WTS says they only regulate sins, not "crimes." Just recently the WTS said this in the August 2024 WT pages 29,30: " In certain circumstances the elders need to be especially careful before reinstating someone. For example, if a person was guilty of child abuse or apostasy or if he schemed to end a marriage, the elders would want to be sure that he is truly repentant. (Mal. 2:14; 2 Tim. 3:6) They must protect the flock. At the same time, we need to realize that Jehovah will accept back any wrongdoer who shows genuine repentance and stops engaging in wrong conduct. So although the elders exercise due caution with those who have dealt treacherously with others, they should not go so far as to say that certain types of sinners can never receive Jehovah’s mercy.c​—1 Pet. 2:10.

    (How does the WTS think they can determine if a pedophile jw has stopped engaging in child sexual abuse?!) (pardon the links, try to find a way to stop them)
  • Beth Sarim
    Beth Sarim

    Actually a "thug"" in good standing who has privileges like an elder,, MS or something of the like

  • stan livedeath
    stan livedeath

    i wonder how many more will come forward in this Al Fayad case---and how many arent genuine--just sniffing the money.

  • blondie
    blondie

    Beth Sarim, you see that has happened before. But even if he had been found guilty by "caesar's" court, he would still have retained his good standing because the elders would have been his judge in the congregation. Makes me angry too.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit