It's just like the English legal system, when a new precedent is set...
The law never changes ... only our 'understanding'of that law changes..
(Ahem..said in pompous stentorian tone)đ
by stuckinarut2 19 Replies latest watchtower bible
It's just like the English legal system, when a new precedent is set...
The law never changes ... only our 'understanding'of that law changes..
(Ahem..said in pompous stentorian tone)đ
I agree that the first reaction of JW's to Russell's words will be as said above, they themselves are "old light".
But if we can, why not try to get JW's to see the correctness of his argument., even if it was made in 1881.
The next bit of the quote that JWFacts provides above is :
" If you were lighting up a building containing seven gas jets you would not extinguish one every time you lighted another, but would add one light to another and they would be in harmony and thus give increase of light: So is it with the light of truth; the true increase is by adding to, not by substituting one for another.'
Sadly, old Chuck Taze was not authorized to make decrees. He was just a zealous bible student, not part of the FDS collective.
Have you forgotten about this?
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/267807/jj-abrams-wtbts
DD
Great article Fading Truth!
Thanks for posting that link!
Mad Irishman,
They
know they are telling the truth because they have to keep correcting themselves. As they say:
âSome have called Jehovahâs witnesses âfalse prophetsâ because, in times past, they have viewed things a certain way and, later, have made a change through their official publications. Or, there may have been practices by some members in the organization that have been permitted to continue for a time for lack of knowledge as to how to handle these things, but later they have learned from Godâs Word what his will is and have gone ahead and made the necessary corrections. False prophets do not correct themselvesâ (The Watchtower, June 1, 1967, page 331)
Doug
Whether they express themselve explicitly about "new light" or not, the proof is in their actions right to the present day.
Will they get "new light" about "new light"?
Doug