Has The "Evil Slave" Died Out?

by Sea Breeze 17 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Balaamsass2
    Balaamsass2

    The weird thing was they were terrified I might call on their doors while out in service..like meeting satan himself. All the while proudly displaying all of Russel's "Study in the Scriptures" on the living room bookshelf with the family "information March" group photos and sound car photos.

  • dropoffyourkeylee
    dropoffyourkeylee
    Several of the breakaway groups still print their literature and reprint the Russell-era literature. Dawn and the LHMM are still in business, though quite small. They have conventions also. I believe also there are some individual congregation/ecclesias still in existence in the Chicago area. I corresponded with someone on this site a few years ago who attends one such ecclesia.
  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    The ‘evil slave’ is a motif in a parable. So because it isn’t actually a thing that exists, it would be accurate to say it hasn’t died out.

  • Journeyman
    Journeyman

    The current GB did an about-turn on the concept of the "evil slave" a few years back. Where formerly it was believed it represented an apostate influence breaking away from the organisation, now they just say it is symbolic and was a warning of what might have happened to the FDS.

    In case you find the below TLDR, I've underlined the key points.

    In the book "God’s Kingdom of a Thousand Years Has Approached" from 1973, they wrote:

    60. (a) Were individuals who act like “that evil slave” appointed as such by the Master? (b) What do all such individuals form in general?

    60 If there is a class of spirit-begotten, anointed Christians who act according to the description of “that evil slave,” it is not the Lord Jesus who appointed them and put them in charge of his domestics or “household staff.” Individuals who were once members of the “faithful and discreet slave” class may break away for selfish reasons such as personal ambitions, power over others and self-indulgence. These self-seekers may form themselves into groups in pursuit of their goals. However, they would form one general class, separate and distinct from the “faithful and discreet” slave class.

    61. What is it reasonable to say as to whether there would be cases that could be used to illustrate what Jesus said about the “evil slave”?

    61 It is reasonable to believe that the Lord Jesus would not use an illustration without having some cases, or a general case, with which to furnish an example of what he meant, as far as conduct and the outcome thereof is concerned. This would illustrate, not that Jesus appointed “that evil slave” class or type of Christians, but that it really happens to unfaithful, unreliable, untrustworthy, indiscreet Christians during his invisible parousia or presence just as he described.

    62. What instances of this were there, especially during World War I days, and how did this affect the “faithful and discreet slave” class?

    62 There were instances of this in the ranks of the International Bible Students Association right after the death in 1916 C.E. of the editor of The Watch Tower and founder of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. There were attempts on the part of some individuals to seize power and control contrary to the provisions of the Society’s Charter. There were disagreements as to who made up the Lord’s approved organization. The power-seeking ones and those dissatisfied with sincere efforts to conduct matters according to the legal Charter and Bible principles were frustrated. They indulged in considerable ‘beating of their fellow slaves’ in a verbal way in print and by word of mouth and in judicial court. They put themselves on the side of the “confirmed drunkards” of this world, spiritually speaking, especially during those days of World War I. All of this put the stability of the organization, which was then under increasing religious persecution, to a great test. It brought a great trial upon the “faithful and discreet slave” class.

    However, in a WT in 2013, the Org 'clarified' this to explain that the "evil slave" is purely theoretical - no-one is really an "evil slave", it was simply a warning to the FDS that that is what they might become if they prove unfaithful, which of course according to themselves, they are not!

    “IF EVER THAT EVIL SLAVE . . .”

    Jesus has placed the weightiest of responsibilities on the faithful and discreet slave​—namely, overseeing the domestics and giving out spiritual food at the proper time. Jesus knew that those with greater responsibility have greater accountability. (Luke 12:48) Hence, he concluded his illustration about the faithful and discreet slave with a powerful warning.

    Jesus warned about an evil slave who concludes in his heart that the master is delaying and who starts to beat his fellow slaves. When the master arrives, said Jesus, he will punish that evil slave “with the greatest severity.”​—Read Matthew 24:48-51.

    Was Jesus foretelling that there would be an evil slave class in the last days? No. Granted, some individuals have manifested a spirit similar to that of the evil slave described by Jesus. We would call them apostates, whether they were of the anointed or of the “great crowd.” (Rev. 7:9) But such ones do not make up an evil slave class. Jesus did not say that he would appoint an evil slave. His words here are actually a warning directed to the faithful and discreet slave.

    Notice that Jesus introduces the warning with the words “if ever.” One scholar says that in the Greek text, this passage “for all practical purposes is a hypothetical condition.” In effect, Jesus was saying: ‘If the faithful and discreet slave were ever to mistreat his fellow slaves in these ways, this is what the master will do when he arrives.’ (See also Luke 12:45.) However, the composite faithful and discreet slave has continued to keep on the watch and to provide nourishing spiritual food.

    The anointed brothers who together serve as the faithful slave recognize that they are accountable to the Master for the way they care for his domestics. The heartfelt desire of these anointed brothers is to fulfill their responsibility loyally so that they might hear a “well done” from the Master when he finally arrives.

    A suspiciously easy brush off to the warning Jesus gave, IMO. Personally, I think Jesus WAS warning that those claiming to be Christians taking the lead in the time of the end could fall into wicked practices and become effectively an "evil slave" - and that is indeed happening. There are too many repeated instances of the scriptures warning "keep on the watch", "keep testing yourself", "stay awake", etc, along with similar parables like the foolish virgins with no oil for their lamps, the wedding guest who is booted out for not being properly dressed, and so on, for it to simply be a light warning easily brushed off with "we're ok, we're eagerly listening to the voice of the Master", which is what the GB seems to say dismissively.

    And of course, individuals and groups claiming to be Christian and taking the lead in many other denominations are also similarly proving false to Christ's commission. All such risk the wrath of the Master when he returns, so it's a very serious matter if one claims to be a Christian, especially if claiming to be in a leading and shepherding role.

    Also, there are too many past examples in the Bible of leaders among God's people being 'corrupted' - from many prophets and kings in Israel, through some members of the early Christian congregation down to Judas - for individuals in Christian leadership roles to be overconfident about their position. From the Devil's point of view, such corruption is exactly what he wants, and from a human point of view, it has a certain inevitability as a tempting character flaw - as the saying goes: "Power corrupts..." etc.

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot
    KerryKing - “…They might have left it a bit late for that, all the recent changes are their own…”

    Exactly my point.

    Pin the label on him, and if they’re put to the question, spin the current “reforms” as a course-correction away from the mess he left.

    Wouldn’t even be a lie, really.

    (not that I think they’d actually do it)

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    Thanks S.B great question, as someone else said. They do this a lot of course, picking which bits they say are symbolic and which bits literal.

    I spoke with an old J.W a few weeks back, and though much of my side of the conversation was showing the errors in having faith in the words of men, he maintained that he felt the J.W's had "got most of it right", I did not launch in to lots of stuff, or anything much that I could have, as I feel at this time he needs the religion, he is in his eighties, and his wife is terminally ill.

    But he DID say he could not believe the figure of 144,000 in Rev. was literal, which surprised me a bit, I just said "Yes, if that is literal why not the all that is in the verses around it ?"

    I hope to speak with him again soon, not to attack his faith in any way, but to be a support to him in his time of need, I love the old boy, he was a generous guy, and an Elder that, rarely, for an Elder, "got his hands dirty" by doing work other Elders would have assigned to someone else. Work that many did not know he did, he would tidy up a garden for one of the J.W's for example, but not many would have known of this, or the other things like that which he was accustomed to doing, he was a real Shepherd too, he did real pastoral work.

    But, if a chink is appearing with him, a lifelong J.W for over 80 years, then others must be having more questions that they do not push to the backs of their minds.

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    The “Evil Slave” is an anachronism that belongs in the past. The Watchtower no longer teaches that it is a real thing .. It is a phrase that you will not hear in today’s Organisation.

    Also, They changed the wording of the NWT so that the verse no longer reads that we are mentally diseased. That too has hit the dust.

  • iloowy.goowy
    iloowy.goowy

    If you're wondering what some of those "separated" brothers are up to visit the http://ChristianBelieversConference.org and notice some of them separated from Russell in 1909, they separated over the New Covenant and Russell's weird belief that it was still future. They were joined by those opposed to Rutherford after the take over. They go by the name Free Bible Students and don't study any Watchtower publications, neither Russell's or Rutherford's books, and least of all the current JW publications, just the Bible. I found them on Wikipedia under Free Bible Students.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit