Yeah, we'll probably never know what the reality was but one thing we DO know for certain - he absolutely did have something to fucking hide otherwise he would have recorded it.
The Lloyd Evans JC of 2013 is like the exJW version of the JFK assassination.
Like the Warren Commission, his stated version makes little sense and has so many plot holes and leads that were never followed.
If Apostasy was discussed during the JC, perhaps it was only one of several issues that the elders had with Lloyd.
Precisely. I’m sure apostasy was one of the reasons he was summoned. But it wasn’t the only reason. Was Lee Harvey Oswald involved in the JFK assassination? Absolutely. But was he the lone gunman, and no one else knew what he was up to? We are meant to believe he was, just as Lloyd Evans was buttering up his audience with tales of apostasy in preparation for his JC.
You really had to be there following him on FB at the time. The initial announcement that he was being summoned was followed by update after update like he was reporting for the BBC.
Would Dijana be summoned too?
Would Lloyd appeal the decision?
How do the in-laws figure into this, and could the poor Evans couple with a child on the way be on the street!?!
Stay tuned!
You know what else happened? Tonnes of messages of solidarity and support, a bunch of “go get ‘em Lloyd, we have your back!!”
It was like the finale of Lost or The Sopranos, everyone wanted to know what happened. And like The Sopranos, Lloyd went to a black screen before the action began.
(Spoiler Alert) Tony Soprano got shot and the Wilmslow incident(s) followed Lloyd into the Sisak JC.
I’m telling you if he recorded that JC it would still be getting views today. He’d be doing livestreams on it on the anniversary dates complete with new commentary.
Why didn’t he record it and just delete the inconvenient parts?
What if comparatively little of it was about the apostasy, enough to make an abridged recording untenable?