There's a lot not only in that livestream but in statements he's made over the years that he's unintentionally revealed there is more to what he is telling us.
With that in mind, check out footnote #97 in TRA regarding the first JC:
When preparing this chapter I came
across the letters and emails I sent to
Wilmslow and Bramhall elders over this
period, which are still on my hard drive
and now make for disturbing reading.
The tone is self-abasing as I prostrate
myself, scrambling to avoid
disfellowshipping at a time when
rescuing my marriage should have been
my only concern. It is obvious that I
was a completely different, more
servile person than I am now, and
acting under powerful forces I was then
unable to comprehend.
Does this sound like he only got caught sexting? Multiple "letters and emails" to elders in two congregations? He makes it clear he wanted to avoid DFing more so than his marriage crumbling, probably because he knew he could manipulate his wife. All of this over sexting?
But the parent passage in his book seemingly contradicts this:
In a series of disciplinary
meetings before a “judicial
committee” comprised of three
elders I was asked to go into
extremely intimate detail regarding
the nature of my online encounters,
what precisely these involved, with
whom and how often.
[96] These
hearings were extremely emotional.
I recall breaking down in tears on at
least one occasion. At the time I did
not feel the nature of questioning
was overly invasive or
inappropriate. I believed I was
receiving needed discipline from
God’s organization, and I simply
had to man up and see it through for
the benefit of my marriage. Of
course, I now cringe at the thought
of sharing such personal matters
with men who had no more right to
this information than my local
postman or storekeeper, but at the
time I was convinced it was
necessary.
[97]
In this passage he thought coming clean to the elders would save his marriage! Which one is it?!
So we know that it was a "series" of JCs with elders from both Wilmslow and Bramhall congregations. All due to at least two instances of sexting? The level of detail and the hoops he had to jump through doesn't match the crime of sexting.
It would however match the crime of an actual physical encounter with one or more of his chat victims.