Joe Biden Scores Whopping 85 Percent Approval Among Those Who Watched Address to Congress

by Disillusioned JW 23 Replies latest social current

• 

  iXav

  Another interesting study might be to investigate YouTube channels that have been banned, what they have been banned for, and see if left-wing and right-wing youtubers are (approximately) equally represented.
  

  I actually don't disagree with your point. What you will notice with the media ban on right wing vs left wing issue is about money. On youtube for example, take someone called Alex Jones, he had a channel and youtube didn't really care for years and they made a lot of money out of him. What changed? It became too hot at some point and the potential commercial impact on youtube meant that he got the chop.
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  What changed? It became too hot at some point and the potential commercial impact on youtube meant that he got the chop - why doesn't YouTube ban left-wing channels that become too hot?
  
• 

  DATA-DOG

  It’s not wrong to have an agenda. If I’m a journalist and my goal is to report the truth in an objective manner then my agenda would be to reveal how the Mainstream Legacy Media are spinning the facts, no matter who they are, or what side they are on.

  If the agenda of a journalist was to tell you the truth and help you be a self-actualizing individual and promote Populism as opposed to Communism or Socialism then what an incredible and rare journalist that would be.

  This is why we need Podcasting and alternative, non-censored discussions. Joe Biden simply repeated Globalist agendas and Dog Whistles which garner approval from the ill-informed public who swelter over Stelter and lactate over Lemon.

  DD
  
• 

  iXav

  What changed? It became too hot at some point and the potential commercial impact on youtube meant that he got the chop - why doesn't YouTube ban left-wing channels that become too hot?
  

  Do you have an example?
• 

  iXav

  This is why we need Podcasting and alternative, non-censored discussions.
  

  This can be a double edged sword. I will rather we have a move towards more fact checking.
• 

  Rocketman123

  
• 

  minimus

  The jury pool are Democrats. The silly poll is typically tainted. If you asked Republicans if they liked Trump’s speech or Biden”s before the Congress , the overwhelming response was Trump hands down. Go to Hollywood celebrities and since the pool is tainted they will say they love anything the Dems say to like. Incidentally, I heard on the radio some other poll said Biden’s numbers were horrible. Lol
• 

  DATA-DOG

  Fact-checking? Who’s fact-checking, the fact-checkers??

  Again, this is why we need non-censored discussions that don’t rely on the nonsensical S.I.F.T method that runs people through Google’s pre-determined “Fact-Checkers” who are all paid for by entities that decide what “facts” you need to see.

  We need real Journalists. They are out there, but they aren’t on CNN.

  DD
• 

  iXav

  We need real Journalists. They are out there, but they aren’t on CNN.
  

  They are out there and they are starving.

  Gone are the days of real journalism.
• 

  LoveUniHateExams

  What changed? It became too hot at some point and the potential commercial impact on youtube meant that he got the chop - why doesn't YouTube ban left-wing channels that become too hot?
  

  Do you have an example? - er, no this isn't how honest debate works

  I'm wondering about youtube's pro-left, anti-right agenda, then you gave an example of a banned right-winger but claimed this was because of his channel becoming too hot. Then I asked why doesn't youtube ban left-wing channels that become too hot?

  Y'see, I'm asking this question to explore social media's apparent bias.

  If you want to answer that question, that would be fine.