All this "website" talk from the Jehovah's Witnesses is part of the "closed-world assumption" that permeates groups like the JWs and Mormons.
While the term is now used in building the framework for computer systems, the terminology was borrowed from the way people often present facts as if everyone knows that a certain fact is true, or as in this particular case, important.
How often do people outside of the Watchtower's influence discuss and even long for websites that are translated into a large number of languages? How often is the subject discussed when important issues arise?
It's a non-issue. It only means something to the JWs because their website is now the central disseminating point of their nonsense. Nobody else cares.
Recall when it used to be the printed publications that all the boasting was about? How often did they crow about how many Watchtower magazines were being printed and in how many countries and languages? Sounded impressive, but not a week went by in field service that I failed coming across at least one person who had never read, seen, or heard of The Watchtower magazine. The now-defunct Worldwide Church of God used the same self-praise with its membership regarding The Plain Truth magazine.
But in real life, what did it matter? Who cared? Were you impressed by The Plain Truth's distribution numbers when Armstrong was alive? Did you know them? Did you even realized they existed? Do you even know that magazine existed?
It's a cult tactic. If the JWs were using a dirty toilet as the means to distribute their nonsense, they would be boasting about how their dirty toilet gets used by more people around the world from more language groups than any other toilet.
The fact of the matter is that religions generally don't use one single website to teach everything to all their members. First off, the religions of the world are too large. Can you imagine if you had all the Roman Catholics of the world downloading their Sunday Mass readings from one single website? How many language groups are we talking about? How many countries? How many non-Catholics attend Mass? And we're not mentioning RCIA classes, Cana marriage courses, catechism for children, etc., all coming from one, single website. Could one website handle the traffic of 1.2 billion plus people?
The Catholic Church reaches everybody, everywhere, and did it before websites. It can still do all this without relying on websites. The same goes for other religions, Christian and non-Christian. Most have a plethora of websites per denomination, each serving a very specific need in a complex paradigm of networks within each. Religions are also multicultural and thus use different sites to meet the specific needs of various cultural and language groups.
So all this JW talk about how great their single website is? It is a source of pride for those cult zombies, but no one else cares.