Michael died twice for JW's sins.

by moomanchu 11 Replies latest jw friends

  • moomanchu
    moomanchu

    Once when Jehovah turned him into a sperm and once when the Romans crucified him.

    Technically sperm is still alive when used for invitro fertilization. Then again is sleeping in a tomb for a few hours really dead ?

    Forget it, no one died for JW's sins. 😂

  • Rattigan350
    Rattigan350

    What is the purpose of that post?

  • Simon
    Simon

    Newsflash: imaginary literary character involved in ridiculous story plot.

  • raymond frantz
    raymond frantz

    What are you on about? Kindly articulate your thoughts

  • moomanchu
    moomanchu

    What is the purpose of that post?

    It's fun to muse about the ridiculousness of JW doctrine.

    What are you on about?

    Where did Michael go when he was converted into a zygote?


  • BelisemDeBelimakom
    BelisemDeBelimakom
    Jesus is not Michael the Archangel, He can't be. There is no single archangel as the JWs claim (See Daniel 10). it's a WT fabrication. So they want to make Jesus look inferior and to reinforce the "belief" that there is nothing divine about him..


    6 biblical facts about the archangel Michael

    1. Michael is the only one the Bible calls an archangel

    We’re told Michael’s title in Jude 9. The Greek word for “archangel” (archággelos) means “chief angel” or “chief messenger.” The word “archangel” isn’t use to describe him in the Old Testament, but another angel calls him one of the chief princes (Dan 10:13).

    Calling Michael “one of the chief princes” implies that Michael has peers. However, if there are any other archangels, the Bible doesn’t tell us who they are.

    2. Michael stands guard over Israel

    In Daniel’s last vision, an angel describes how the last days will play out for the Jews. It is at this time that Michael, “the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people will arise” (Dan 12:1). The angel also refers to Michael as Daniel’s prince (Dan 10:21). The Bible doesn’t say what “standing guard” entails, but it’s very clear that Michael has special responsibilities for Israel.

    3. Michael directly opposes Satan

    Jude mentions that Michael argues with Satan about the body of Moses (a nod to a Jewish tradition). Unfortunately, we’re not given any more information on what that argument was about. Jude does tell us that Michael wasn’t so bold as to pronounce a “railing judgment” (the Greek word for “railing” is often translated “blasphemous” or “defaming”) against the devil. What he does say is interesting enough to merit a fact to itself . . .

    4. Michael only says four words in the Bible

    Well, three Greek words that are often translated into four English words. In Jude 9, Michael says to Satan, “The Lord rebuke you!”

    5. Michael is a military commander of some angels

    In John’s apocalypse, he sees a great war in heaven: Michael and his angels vs. the dragon (Satan) and his angels. The devil and his forces are too weak to remain in heaven, however, and so they are all thrown down to earth (Rev 12:7–9).

    6. Michael battles the patron angels of other nations

    In Daniel chapter 10, the prophet fasts, humbling himself before God and praying for understanding regarding the Jews’ future. An angel finally appears to him 21 days later, and explains the delay: the “prince of Persia” had been opposing him the whole time, and it wasn’t until Michael relieved the angel that he could continue his trip to Daniel. The angel stays with Daniel long enough to give an outline of future events for the Jews, but must return to fighting the prince of Persia (and the prince of Greece will soon join the fight, too). Only Michael supports this angel against these forces (Dan 10:21).

    Source https://overviewbible.com/michael-archangel/

  • PetrW
    PetrW

    @moomanchu

    Technically sperm is still alive when used for invitro fertilization. Then again is sleeping in a tomb for a few hours really dead ?

    ***

    Technically...Mary could have been - in modern terms - a surrogate mother. Something about this is suggested by the text John 1:13, where it is written that he was not born of blood, nor of the will of the flesh or of man. We don't know at what stage of development this embryo was "inserted" into the body, and we don't know exactly if Mary contributed her genetic "material" to the development of the fetus. We only know that she is designated as the mother.

  • Duran
    Duran

    1 Thessalonians 4:16 because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel’s voice and with God’s trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first. 17 Afterward we the living who are surviving will, together with them, be caught away in clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and thus we will always be with the Lord.

    Matt 24:30 Then the sign of the Son of man will appear in heaven, and all the tribes of the earth will beat themselves in grief, and they will see the Son of man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he will send out his angels with a great trumpet sound, and they will gather his chosen ones together from the four winds, from one extremity of the heavens to their other extremity.

  • moomanchu
    moomanchu

    petrW,

    we don't know exactly if Mary contributed her genetic "material" to the development of the fetus.

    Luke traces Mary's blood line to King David. Why do this if her egg wasn't used?


  • PetrW
    PetrW

    @moomanchu

    Right after I solve the mystery of turning water into wine and learn to walk on water like Peter, I'll start thinking about the immaculate conception of the Virgin Mary...

    More seriously: this is just my rationalization, and as stated above, it's more of an academic debate. Jesus was born of a woman (Gal 4:4) because it fits biblical anthropology. A man is defined as one who is born of a woman (outside of the first pair).

    In the context of Jesus, the bigger question is really why was he born a man? Why didn't he come as an angel? The answers then go more into the realm of (first Adam - last Adam) divine justice and theodicea explanation. I mean, the explanation of very difficult questions...

    For a faith without difficulties, it is sometimes good to accept the claims, especially if they are (historical) facts, and not to speculate too much on the variants. I don't mean to shy away from the answer! It's just that I think it's really quite a difficult topic and I'd have to write several pages of text here (about theodicy). And only the conclusion would be easy...

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit