An essay by Rush Limbaugh

by Jayson 16 Replies latest social current

  • Jayson
    Jayson

    You guys said I need to listen to him. (Talk radio & FOX <yawn>)

    ------ him or loath him, he nailed this one right on the head............. By Rush Limbaugh:

    I think the vast differences in compensation between victims of the September 11 casualty and those who die serving the country in Uniform are profound. No one is really talking about it either, because you just don't criticize anything having to do with September 11.

    Well, I just can't let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the entitlement mentality of this country.

    If you lost a family member in the September 11 attack, you're going to get an average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7 million.

    If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed In action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half of which is taxable. Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry.

    And there's a payment of $211 per month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt.

    Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of $1.185 million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough. Their deaths were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and they and their families know the dangers.

    We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that the September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation as well.

    You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad.

    Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low-rent housing. Make sense?

    However, our own U.S. Congress just voted themselves a raise, and many of you don't know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month, and most are now equal to being millionaires plus. They also do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system.

    If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, you may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed you in harm's way receive a pension of $15,000 per month. I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now fighting.

    "When do we finally do something about this?" If this doesn't seem fair to you, it is time to forward this to as many people as you can.

    If your interested there is more.......................

    This must be a campaign issue in 2004. Keep it going. SOCIAL SECURITY: (This is worth the read. It's short and to the point.)

    Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years. Our Senators and Congressmen do not pay into Social Security. Many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan. In more recent years, no congressperson has felt the need to change it. For all practical purposes their plan works like this:

    When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die, except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments. For example, former Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7,800,000 - that's Seven Million, Eight Hundred Thousand), with their wives drawing $275,000.00 during the last years of their lives. This is calculated on an average life span for each.

    Their cost for this excellent plan is $00.00. These little perks they voted for themselves is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Fund--our tax dollars at work! From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into --every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by our employer) --we can expect to get an average $1,000 per month after retirement. Or, in other words, we
    would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one month to equal Senator Bill Bradley's benefits!

    Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made. And that change would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us and then watch how fast they would fix it.

    If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe good changes will evolve. WE, each one of us... can make a difference..


    Now I assume he is talking men and women enlisted in the Armed Services and not Officers. But I did not check facts here.

  • teenyuck
    teenyuck

    You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad.

    That says it all. Entitlement. I am entitled to what you have. Why? Because I have less.

    Welcome to America.

  • DanTheMan
    DanTheMan

    I like what conservatives say when they don't engage in their usual name-calling and red-faced ranting.

  • reporter
    reporter

    I'm lean liberal mostly, but this piece by Rush Limbaugh is spot on. I despise the entitlement mentality, and, this IS an affront to the troops.

    Yes, it is possible to be liberal but take on conservative values, like running deficit-free limited government and being anti-entitlement. Call it being centrist, if you like.

    I think a key quote is this:

    No one is really talking about it either, because you just don't criticize anything having to do with September 11.

    Unless you're a Canadian, like me. I have and continue to question everything about September 11 here, maybe perhaps too much in some peoples' eyes.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/14/54359/787589/post.ashx#787589

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/14/55043/800929/post.ashx#800929

  • seedy3
    seedy3

    You know, I cannot stand Rush's self centered, Arrogent attitude, and some times he really pours it on thick, BUT he did hit the nail on the head here. I have a few friends in the miliarty, I bet they would love to read this.

    Seedy

  • freedom96
    freedom96

    No doubt the military deserves decent pay.

  • Simon
    Simon

    I think the Sept 11 deaths have been taken adventage of in many ways, politically as an excuse for cetain actions that otherwise would have been impossible and also monetarilly by relatives. It has looked a bit disgusting the way the compensation row has gone on.

  • Kingpawn
    Kingpawn

    They also do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system.

    I hope my local newspaper archives past columns by (my?) local Congressman who recently addressed this very issue. I'll have to try their website or email the publisher.

    DTM, have you ever listened to Glen Beck--not sure of the spelling--he's on WTBN, AM 610 from Columbus--I'm like you, his kind can make sense when they're not name-calling. Generally I'm a liberal or libertarian on issues but I do believe in balanced budgets, for one "conservative" cause.

    If I find anything I can scan or otherwise pass on I'll try to do it ASAP.

  • WildHorses
    WildHorses

    What I want to know is, how do we get this changed? This sure doesn't sound like "By the people for the people"

    They say that by the time I am old enough to recieve it, that social security will most likely be done away with, yet these people can vote for themselves a lifetime of luxury? It has to stop, but how?

  • Double Edge
    Double Edge
    how do we get this changed?

    We should demand for ourselves the same deal they are 'entitled' to.... if it isn't financially feasible, then the politicians should be forced 'entitled' to what we average out. We should make their retirement dependent on how much they save the American taxpayer and run the government efficiently.... any overspending or wasted monies will be deducted from their retirement. (Well, now that that nice dream is over......sighhhhh)

    OR...

    Do what we're doing in California when the politicians are running amuck... Recall the Govenor

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit