Clinton on WMD flap: 'Everybody makes mistakes'

by Yizuman 17 Replies latest social current

  • Yizuman
    Yizuman

    Bill Clinton on Bush uranium line: 'Everybody makes mistakes'

    Former president accepts explanation on State of the Union

    Wednesday, July 23, 2003 Posted: 1:31 PM EDT (1731 GMT)

    alt

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The White House, attacked by critics for a now-retracted line about Iraq seeking uranium from Africa in President Bush's State of the Union address, has gotten some surprising support from former President Clinton.

    "I thought the White House did the right thing in just saying 'we probably shouldn't have said that,' " Clinton told CNN's Larry King in a phone interview Tuesday evening.

    "You know, everybody makes mistakes when they are president," Clinton said. "I mean, you can't make as many calls as you have to make without messing up once in awhile. The thing we ought to be focused on is what is the right thing to do now. That's what I think."

    Clinton had called King to honor his guest, former Republican Sen. Bob Dole, on Dole's 80th birthday.

    Clinton's comments took other Democrats by surprise, many of whom have questioned whether the Bush administration misled the public about the threat from Saddam Hussein. The uranium claim was made at a time Bush was trying to rally world support for military action against Iraq and was used to suggest that Saddam was acting on his nuclear ambitions.

    Wednesday, several members of the Clinton administration took issue with their former boss's take on the controversy.

    "In some critical respects, intelligence was overstated, and it's important for the administration to resolve these questions," said Sandy Berger, the national security adviser under Clinton.

    He said Bush needs to have a news conference to fully explain how the claim about uranium made its way into the nationally televised address, despite CIA concerns about the quality of the intelligence.

    Former Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta agreed. Unless Bush appears before the America people, the "drip, drip, drip is just going to continue."

    But former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright didn't sound so sure. "The most important thing is to move forward," she said. "I agree with President Clinton on that."

    The three came to the Capitol Wednesday to present a foreign policy paper at the request of Senate Democrats.

    Clinton also said Tuesday night that at the end of his term, there was "a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for " in Iraq.

    alt

    "So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N. and for the U.N. to say, 'You got to let these inspectors in, and this time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not just continued sanctions.'"

    Clinton told King: "People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."

    Earlier Tuesday, Bush's No. 2 national security aide took partial responsibility for allowing the inclusion of the dubious claim in the State of the Union address.

    The admission by Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley marked the first time the White House had taken any blame in the matter. An administration official told CNN that Hadley offered his resignation, but Bush didn't accept it.

    CIA takes blame

    Until now, the Bush administration has said it was the CIA that permitted the shaky intelligence to get into the speech, and CIA Director George Tenet has publicly taken full responsibility, although he reportedly told a Senate panel in a closed hearing that he never read the final draft of the speech before Bush delivered it.

    Democrats seized on Tuesday's admission, with Howard Dean -- one of the leading Democratic presidential hopefuls -- calling on Hadley and any other administration officials involved in the flap to step down.

    "It is unacceptable for anyone who misled the president on an issue as significant as a rationale for war to continue to retain a post in government," Dean said in a written statement.

    Democratic National Committee spokesman Tony Welch suggested the president should be held responsible for the retracted claim.

    "First they blamed the Brits. Then, CIA Director George Tenet walked the plank," Welch said. "Now, the Bush White House is dragging former Cheney aide and Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley forward to take the fall for the president's bogus claim in this year's State of the Union address."

    Welch added: "Apparently, at the Bush White House, the buck stops everywhere but the president's desk."

    Hadley gave his admission to reporters at an off-camera briefing during a moment when the nation's attention was focused on a decidedly different Iraqi story: the deaths of deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's sons, Uday and Qusay, in a firefight with U.S. troops.

    Hadley, who was responsible for vetting Bush's State of the Union address, said he should have deleted the reference to Iraq's attempts to buy uranium because the CIA had warned him months earlier -- in two memos and a phone call from Tenet himself -- that the claim was weak.

    Those warnings were made to him before a speech the president gave in Cincinnati in early October, and he said he failed to recall them three months later.

    "The high standards the president set were not met," Hadley said.

    He said he had spoken with the president about the matter and that Bush expressed confidence in him and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.

    Tenet has said the line in Bush's address was technically accurate because it cited British intelligence, although he said the CIA's own investigation of those same allegations had led the agency to decide that the evidence was inconclusive. Britain stands by its claims.

    --Congressional Producer Steve Turnham contributed to this report.

  • jelly
    jelly

    I liked Clinton, and I think once again he is going to save the Dems from themselves.

    Terry

  • Guest 77
    Guest 77

    Everybody makes mistakes? No kidding! Who is he trying to convince?

    Guest 77

  • sf
    sf

    'God', on False Ejaculations (spiritual, mental, emotional and physical):

    "Everybody makes mistakes!"

    'God', on His Creation of Foul Ejaculating Child Molesters and Rapists:

    "Oops! I did it again. I played with your heart. 'Everybody' makes mistakes!"

    sKally...i COULD go on klass

  • teejay
    teejay

    Clinton is one of the best presidents of the 20th Century but he's a little too dismissive of the lie Bush told and Bush's weasly scape-goating since.

  • PurpleV
    PurpleV

    It's a back-handed compliment at best. He is saying that Bush messed up, and Bill's comments are keeping the fact that he messed up front-page news.

  • Gamaliel
    Gamaliel

    We tend to find out how good a president really was many years after they are out after secret documents get old enough or legal enough to publicize without hurting national security.

    So far, these documents have always given evidence that most of our presidents since day 1 have been war criminals. Funny thing is, some of the President's I had heard were the worst as I was growing up have turned out to be fairly conscientious. Has anyone been listening to the LBJ White House tapes (recorded phone conversations) they've been playing on C-SPAN 3 on several Cable company networks?

    There's no way to tell why or even if Clinton sees this answer as moderating the Dem's position, but I would trust that he knows he was guilty of the same and it might not be too bright at the moment to use up anti-Republican ammo until closer to the election. When we're tired of it, it won't have the same effectiveness, and the Dem's will need effective ammo when it's slinging in both directions.

    Gamaliel

  • dubla
    dubla
    it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."

    no, no, no! clinton cant be saying this, because the wmd claim was all bushs idea! it was bushs lie, wasnt it? didnt he mastermind this whole thing? how can the former president, a democrat, possibly believe this? wasnt the wmd claim fabricated as part of the right-wing agenda of controlling the worlds oil supplies? im so confused.

    aa

  • rem
    rem

    LOL @ Dubla

    rem

  • Gamaliel
    Gamaliel

    I understand your sarcasm, dubla, but have you read any of the documentation from that Jewish, communist, linguist who teaches at MIT? (Chomsky) I've started reading some of his work, and I understand why his evidence is considered too unassailable for two-sided debates (TV, Internet, etc). He always seems to make use of the evidence already admitted and documented directly from the faction he is exposing. In other words, if he says something against Clinton, Clinton would have to say he was lying if he wanted to defend himself. Same with Bush.

    If I am to believe Chomsky, then Clinton and Bush had pretty much the same agenda when it comes to war and the policy in the Middle East. The big trick of the presidency is to do the same thing the other party would do, but pretend you are doing it differently. I haven't read his take on the Middle East yet, but from the Reagan/Bush I/Clinton documentation he's exposed already about our foreign policy in many other countries, I won't be surprised at much of anything now.

    As impossible as it seems that certain people would change their beliefs, I'd wager that several of the most vocal political arguers on this forum would actually change their tune if they read Chomsky's documentation (aka CIA documentation, NSA documtation, etc).

    Gamaliel

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit