sKally:
I understand that frustration with red tape, trust me. And you're not the only person asking these questions. Unfortunately, I'm not a legal guy, so I can't give good answers as to why Vicki's lawyer chose the strategy he did. There was good stuff given to him that was not used.
But now the trial is over, and verdict has been given. The question being resolved now is costs, and again, the written submissions have been made. The Judge must make her decision on what she has been given in the case, not on material submitted to her outside of the case. That's just the way it is. Personally, I'm more hopeful of getting a good result on the costs than I was with the original case.
And let's not lose sight of the huge significance of this case that Vicki has already achieved. This is precedental (is that a word?) stuff.
Expatbrit