XJWBill, yes I have read Boswell. His work is exceptionally well researched and factually presented. If you haven't yet read it, I also highly recommend his work "Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality".
My father was a Presbyterian minister, a graduate of Princeton Seminary (I was the only person in my family to ever become a JW), so I was exposed to the scriptures in their original languages from a very early age. I also find Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible an indispensible tool in studying the scriptures in their original form.
Had Enough, I would welcome a discussion thread on the origin of the supposed Biblical condemnation of homosexuality. Meanwhile, I would suggest having a look at the website of Dr. Rembert Truluck, who is the author of the book "Steps to Recovery From Bible Abuse". The link is:
* http://www.truluck.com/
Safe4Kids, as regards Logical's tirade, I am actually indebted to him, for he has graphically demonstrated once again the ugliness of hatred and bigotry masquerading as "Christian love".
Finally, Logical, as follow up to Safe4Kids' posting, you may find interest with this article, posted at http://www.shpm.com/articles/glb/glbtphobia.html as follows:
"Is Homophobia Associated With Homosexual Arousal?
by Henry E. Adams, Ph.D., Lester W. Wright, Jr., Ph.D. and Bethany A. Lohr New Study Links Homophobia with Homosexual arousal
Questions Whether It Is Latent Homosexuality Or A Response to Anxiety
Psychoanalytic theory holds that homophobia --the fear, anxiety, anger, discomfort and aversion that some ostensibly heterosexual people hold for gay individuals -- is the result of repressed homosexual urges that the person is either unaware of or denies. A study appearing in the August issue of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association (APA), provides new empirical evidence that is consistent with that theory.
Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted an experiment involving 35 homophobic men and 29 non-homophobic men as measured by the Index of Homophobia scale. All the participants selected for the study described themselves as exclusively heterosexual both in terms of sexual arousal and experience.
Each participant was exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual and lesbian videotapes (but not necessarily in that order). Their degree of sexual arousal was measured by penile plethysmography, which precisely measures and records male tumescence.
Men in both groups were aroused by about the same degree by the video depicting heterosexual sexual behavior and by the video showing two women engaged in sexual behavior. The only significant difference in degree of arousal between the two groups occurred when they viewed the video depicting male homosexual sex: "The homophobic men showed a significant increase in penile circumference to the male homosexual video, but the control [non-homophobic] men did not."
Broken down further, the measurements showed that while 66% of the non-homophobic group showed no significant tumescence while watching the male homosexual video, only 20% of the homophobic men showed little or no evidence of arousal. Similarly, while 24% of the non-homophobic men showed definite tumescence while watching the homosexual video, 54% of the homophobic men did.
When asked to give their own subjective assessment of the degree to which they were aroused by watching each of the three videos, men in both groups gave answers that tracked fairly closely with the results of the objective physiological measurement, with one exception: the homophobic men significantly underestimated their degree of arousal by the male homosexual video.
Do these findings mean, then, that homophobia in men is a reaction to repressed homosexual urges, as psychoanalysis theorizes? While their findings are consistent with that theory, the authors note that there is another, competing theoretical explanation: anxiety. According to this theory, viewing the male homosexual videotape may have caused negative emotions (such as anxiety) in the homophobic men, but not in the non-homophobic men. As the authors note, "anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal and erection," and so it is also possible that "a response to homosexual stimuli [in these men] is a function of the threat condition rather than sexual arousal per se. These competing notions can and should be evaluated by future research."
