Is America turning into a religion? Is the problem lack of intel sources?

by reporter 11 Replies latest social current

  • reporter
    reporter

    America is a religion US leaders now see themselves as priests of a divine mission to rid the world of its demons

    George Monbiot

    Tuesday July 29, 2003 (The Guardian) "The death of Uday and Qusay," the commander of the ground forces in Iraq told reporters on Wednesday, "is definitely going to be a turning point for the resistance." Well, it was a turning point, but unfortunately not of the kind he envisaged. On the day he made his announcement, Iraqi insurgents killed one US soldier and wounded six others. On the following day, they killed another three; over the weekend they assassinated five and injured seven. Yesterday they slaughtered one more and wounded three. This has been the worst week for US soldiers in Iraq since George Bush declared that the war there was over.

    Few people believe that the resistance in that country is being coordinated by Saddam Hussein and his noxious family, or that it will come to an end when those people are killed. But the few appear to include the military and civilian command of the United States armed forces. For the hundredth time since the US invaded Iraq, the predictions made by those with access to intelligence have proved less reliable than the predictions made by those without. And, for the hundredth time, the inaccuracy of the official forecasts has been blamed on "intelligence failures".

    The explanation is wearing a little thin. Are we really expected to believe that the members of the US security services are the only people who cannot see that many Iraqis wish to rid themselves of the US army as fervently as they wished to rid themselves of Saddam Hussein? What is lacking in the Pentagon and the White House is not intelligence (or not, at any rate, of the kind we are considering here), but receptivity. Theirs is not a failure of information, but a failure of ideology.

    To understand why this failure persists, we must first grasp a reality which has seldom been discussed in print. The United States is no longer just a nation. It is now a religion. Its soldiers have entered Iraq to liberate its people not only from their dictator, their oil and their sovereignty, but also from their darkness. As George Bush told his troops on the day he announced victory: "Wherever you go, you carry a message of hope - a message that is ancient and ever new. In the words of the prophet Isaiah, 'To the captives, "come out," and to those in darkness, "be free".'"

    So American soldiers are no longer merely terrestrial combatants; they have become missionaries. They are no longer simply killing enemies; they are casting out demons. The people who reconstructed the faces of Uday and Qusay Hussein carelessly forgot to restore the pair of little horns on each brow, but the understanding that these were opponents from a different realm was transmitted nonetheless. Like all those who send missionaries abroad, the high priests of America cannot conceive that the infidels might resist through their own free will; if they refuse to convert, it is the work of the devil, in his current guise as the former dictator of Iraq.

    As Clifford Longley shows in his fascinating book Chosen People, published last year, the founding fathers of the USA, though they sometimes professed otherwise, sensed that they were guided by a divine purpose. Thomas Jefferson argued that the Great Seal of the United States should depict the Israelites, "led by a cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night". George Washington claimed, in his inaugural address, that every step towards independence was "distinguished by some token of providential agency". Longley argues that the formation of the American identity was part of a process of "supersession". The Roman Catholic church claimed that it had supplanted the Jews as the elect, as the Jews had been repudiated by God. The English Protestants accused the Catholics of breaking faith, and claimed that they had become the beloved of God. The American revolutionaries believed that the English, in turn, had broken their covenant: the Americans had now become the chosen people, with a divine duty to deliver the world to God's dominion. Six weeks ago, as if to show that this belief persists, George Bush recalled a remark of Woodrow Wilson's. "America," he quoted, "has a spiritual energy in her which no other nation can contribute to the liberation of mankind." ( no, not even you, France and Germany!)

    Gradually this notion of election has been conflated with another, still more dangerous idea. It is not just that the Americans are God's chosen people; America itself is now perceived as a divine project. In his farewell presidential address, Ronald Reagan spoke of his country as a "shining city on a hill", a reference to the Sermon on the Mount. But what Jesus was describing was not a temporal Jerusalem, but the kingdom of heaven. Not only, in Reagan's account, was God's kingdom to be found in the United States of America, but the kingdom of hell could also now be located on earth: the "evil empire" of the Soviet Union, against which His holy warriors were pitched.

    Since the attacks on New York, this notion of America the divine has been extended and refined. In December 2001, Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of that city, delivered his last mayoral speech in St Paul's Chapel, close to the site of the shattered twin towers. "All that matters," he claimed, "is that you embrace America and understand its ideals and what it's all about. Abraham Lincoln used to say that the test of your Americanism was ... how much you believed in America. Because we're like a religion really. A secular religion." The chapel in which he spoke had been consecrated not just by God, but by the fact that George Washington had once prayed there. It was, he said, now "sacred ground to people who feel what America is all about". The United States of America no longer needs to call upon God; it is God, and those who go abroad to spread the light do so in the name of a celestial domain. The flag has become as sacred as the Bible; the name of the nation as holy as the name of God. The presidency is turning into a priesthood.

    So those who question George Bush's foreign policy are no longer merely critics; they are blasphemers, or "anti-Americans". Those foreign states which seek to change this policy are wasting their time: you can negotiate with politicians; you cannot negotiate with priests. The US has a divine mission, as Bush suggested in January: "to defend ... the hopes of all mankind", and woe betide those who hope for something other than the American way of life.

    The dangers of national divinity scarcely require explanation. Japan went to war in the 1930s convinced, like George Bush, that it possessed a heaven-sent mission to "liberate" Asia and extend the realm of its divine imperium. It would, the fascist theoretician Kita Ikki predicted: "light the darkness of the entire world". Those who seek to drag heaven down to earth are destined only to engineer a hell.

    ยท George Monbiot's books Poisoned Arrows and No Man's Land are republished this week by Green Books.

    www.monbiot.com

  • OrbitingTheSun
    OrbitingTheSun

    It wouldn't be the first or the last time religion was a motivating factor for war.

    "There are only two stimulants to one's best efforts: the fear of punishment, and the hope of reward." John M. Wilson

    Religion is an efficient way to stimulate an army because the punishment and reward involved is not material. The source is infinite and if anyone questions it, just tell them they lack faith.

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    Ah yes, the Guardian, bastion of all that is Leftist and a bit anti American, for SURE anti-war. This Opinion column does a lot of name calling, but little fact finding. It ignores the one important fact that came from the deaths of U and Q, the fact that since their deaths the US has had a spike in the amount of intelligence and tips on the whereabouts of Saddam and other high ranking Baathists, witnessed by capturing a few days ago, a large part of Saddam's security detail, and Yesterday, Saddam's longest serving body guard.

    The Guardian wasn't to fond of U and Q dying, but that was a choice they made.

    Sure, many Iraqis want to be rid of the US forces there, many more are glad we took out Saddam, and just want peace.

  • Jayson
    Jayson

    The Guardian in the UK yes we have the Enquirer both give nonbias truthful indepth reporting.

    Jayson <of the buy a gun to piss off a liberal class>

  • Simon
    Simon

    Actually, the Guardian is quiate a well respected broadsheet over here as opposed to a tabloid.

  • Jayson
    Jayson
    America is a religion US leaders now see themselves as priests of a divine mission to rid the world of its demons-Reporters article
    Actually, the Guardian is quiate a well respected broadsheet over here as opposed to a tabloid-Simon

    Well I hate to spell it out but as some people can't see the difference between anti-American propaganda and journalist reporting why should we bother to make a difference?

  • Hamas
    Hamas

    America, a haven for Christian nuts and multi million pound business.

    Beware !

    alt

    altSorry folks, it's true. This man has no dick.

  • reporter
    reporter

    Okie dokie guys and gals.

    Simon: Absolutely the Guardian is the top of the line in my books. Are people forgetting the Guardian being at the forefront of exposing JW scandals including the UN fiasco and the pedophilia nonsense? In fact, while many here were bitching and moaning pleading and whining at the U.S. media to take up the cause of legitimate JW-misdeeds-reporting, it was papers like the Guardian who stepped up to the plate. Now we dog them. Lovely.

    Yerusalyim: You said...Sure, many Iraqis want to be rid of the US forces there, many more are glad we took out Saddam, and just want peace.

    I'll grant you that many would rather see the hasty removal of Saddam and his sons (IMHO his sons were worse than Saddam himself...) however, Iraqis in general don't welcome the US overstay if the US overstays its welcome, if you catch my drift...

    But, since when do those who want to see the US forces leave need to be mutually exclusive to those who want to see Saddam leave? I'd argue that many fall into BOTH categories. It's not dichotomous, necessarily.

    And, on a final note, the business of the Bush administration and the news media glorifying killing of these two sons and trumpeting their trophies is disgusting, I think. Top that off with futures trading on terrorist attacks and future thuggery, and that is the epitome of evil and depravation!

    OrbitingTheSun: I have to tell you first that your smile would melt frozen butter in a deep freezer in Antarctica. :-) Having said that, you're right, pain and pleasure, fear and reward, carrot and stick are twin motivators in humans, and religion largely feeds those twins. Thanks for your insightful answer and actually reading my article...which brings me back to Yeru...

    Yerusalyim: Now that you've dogged the Guardian's liberalness, are you going to dispute anything quoted in it? What about those religious references? What about the Rudy's comment? To me, they stand on their own as strong proof of American tendencies to use provincialism and special pleading in dealing with international treaties and foreign policy. To others, they perhaps would use stronger language.

    I have never seen so many treaties undone by any other U.S. administration than the current one. The problem is, America has to share this same Earth with over 200 other nations, yet, all of us outside the U.S.A. are treated like we don't or shouldn't exist a good part of the time.

    Perhaps most of those insignificant other countries on this small planet don't want the "freedom" and "liberty" of the "American Dream". Perhaps certain people in certain cultures like to live a certain way, that doesn't necessarily coincide with "U.S. interests".

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    The apostles chimed in as if on cue. Now where is the other apostle?

    SS

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    Reporter,

    I've never encountered a people that want to live under fear and oppression yet in all my travels. American style democracy isn't for everyone, by the oppression displayed by Saddam and Sons is for NO ONE.

    Do I dismiss everything printed in the Guardian? No, but I dismiss the entire opinion column quoted in this thread as biased drivel.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit