Which is worse according to the GB: Child Abuse or Apostasy??

by stuckinarut2 29 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Finkelstein
    Finkelstein

    Obviously child sex abuse for there is much more implication of harm towards the WTS's public image,

    Apostasy is just matter of kicking people out who don't go along with the WTS's albeit corrupt marketing strategy, held in place by the organization's own devised doctrines.

  • blondie
    blondie

    Child Abuse = external damage to WTS

    Apostasy = internal damage to WTS

    All damage to WTS in the conclusion

  • sparrowdown
    sparrowdown

    According to the GB there is no crime/sin worse than apostasy.

    Hell, Hitler will be in the paradise just for being dead but we apostates - NOT! lol.

  • doubtfull1799
    doubtfull1799

    I think officially and theoretically they are both considered abhorrent, neither one is worse than the other. However in practice, they are obviously much more pro-active & strict when dealing with apostasy, so that probably reveals the truth of the matter if we believe actions speak louder than words?

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    Realizing that the Org regards "apostates" as worse than f**king child molesters is quite the threshold moment.

  • smiddy
    smiddy

    I think officially and theoretically they are both considered abhorrent, neither one is worse than the other. However in practice, they are obviously much more pro-active & strict when dealing with apostasy, so that probably reveals the truth of the matter if we believe actions speak louder than words?

    So they fear the amount of apostates making themselves known on the internet and social media more than they do the child sexual abuse claims made against the WT /JW religion .

    They can buy off claims of child sexuall abuse with settlements but they cant shut the mouths of those speaking out in social media.and sites like this.

    Thank you for the internet for all those involved .

  • stuckinarut2
    stuckinarut2

    I seriously can't wait for the opportunity to calmly put this rhetorical question to witnesses when I run into them!

  • careful
    careful

    punkofnice,

    there is a GB member/s who is actually a paedophile

    There was, Ted Jaracz. He's gone now, but he set the policies in motion re: child abuse that the current GB have inherited. Also, the current GB were all appointed under his tutelage, even later ones like Sanderson who was allowed to rise in the org when TJ was still alive, after Sanderson had begun partaking of the emblems. No doubt TJ would have told members like Lösch to give the eventual green light to those GB members appointed after TJ died. Therefore, all the current GB members still venerate TJ and his decisions. After all, they are on the GB due to him. This also helps to explain why they are so slow to initiate change on this child abuse matter—only when Caesar's law and the media threaten them, and the WTS lawyers tell them that they have to.

    There have been threads at this forum on TJ's proclivity for girls. Use the search feature if you'd like to track them down.

  • stuckinarut2
    stuckinarut2

    That is a big claim 'careful'.

    Is there proof of that?

  • Math2561
    Math2561

    Its a organization, NOT A RELIGION.... Seriously, child abuse is a lot worse than apostasy......

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit