Watch Tower's ridiculous Defence in Otuo v Morley and Watch Tower

by akromo 14 Replies latest social current

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    akromo - "Watch Tower's ridiculous defence..."

    Is there any other kind? :smirk:

  • Skedaddle
    Skedaddle

    He's representing himself and taking the Watchtower on human rights legislation??? Whoohooooo!!! I love this guy!

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    Skedaddle - "You can see how the Branch is trying to seperate itself from the congregation legally..."

    Yeah, good luck with that. :smirk:

  • problemaddict 2
    problemaddict 2

    This is what stood out to me.

    It is averred that disfellowshipping is a part of the Scripturally based internal religious procedures of Jehovah’s Witnesses which does not involve the determination of any private or public law rights and is therefore non- justiciable before a secular court.

    Let that sink in a bit.

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    Sure, "disfellowshipping" is perfectly legal.

    Ostracizing a disfellowshipped family member, to the point where his or her life and/or emotional well-being are placed at serious risk, though?

    Morally and ethically negligent, at the very least.

    I guarantee you that if/when an XJW actually dies as a direct result of DF-related shunning, the Org is culpable, whether the law protects their right to "shun" or not.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit