Here's the comment on the review I have posted on Amazon.com:
"I am astonished that, to date, the single bad review for this
excellent insight into jw org has been written by an individual, Mr Thomas Carr,
who appears not to have even bothered to read Paul Jackson's well researched
book. If Mr Carr had read the book, rather than engage in a torrent of
uninformed verbal abuse, he would have food for thought about the dubious
methods used by some religious groups.
"I remember one of the Jehovah's
Witnesses' publications from the 1960s, the "Truth" book. It invited readers to
scrutinze their religious beliefs, reasoning that if their beliefs were true
they had nothing to fear from scrutinizing them, but if those beliefs were
false, they owed it to themselves to find out rather than to remain misled. This
encouragement to scrutinize religious beliefs was directed at people in all
other religions, but NOT to Jehovah's Witnesses. Funny that.
"So, Mr Carr,
you owe it to yourself to scrutinze your religious beliefs for, to paraphrase
one of JWs own publications, if your beliefs are true, you have nothing to fear.
But to resort to knee-jerk attacking of a book without even first reading it, is
not the response of someone who is confident they have the truth but instead of
fearing perhaps they do not." GodZoo wrote:
Just curious.. does anyone who does not give a stella review any book written by an ex-jw have to get slated and insulted in here? Is it really that important? Have people not learned to manage rejection and non-acceptance still? Reasonable point. Who said criticizing a review has anything to do with 'managing rejection and non-acceptance'? Even the OP acknowledge there would inevitably be negative reviews. The chief point was the "reviewer" did not appear to have even read the book - so it calls into question whether it even was a "review". Besides, it's that sound distinction between constructive criticism - which furthers discussion and learning - and evident automatic condemnation. Note that the "reviewer" cites not one single statement from the book but trundles out the usual labels. Long may we develop greater acceptance of c onstructive criticism - whether by JWs, ex-JWs or anyone else. But equally, may we have the confidence and clarity of thought to identify and name shoddy thinking!