by minimus 44 Replies latest jw friends
TD unless you are in Muller's office why would you think you should know anything?
How much the public should know and why is a surprisingly complex question and I'm not really qualified to answer it. (But I will take a stab at it when I get some time.)
You seem to have missed the seamless transition from “it is outrageous to suggest we colluded with the Russians” to “what’s on earth is wrong with colluding with the Russians?”
News flash! Soviet/Russians have been meddling in u s. Affairs since the 1950's did anyone from trump campaign collude with Russia to beat Hillary? Answer not one shred of evidence after a year and a half. Just innuendo. Any conspiracy was with the Hillary camp.
With all the LEAKING going on, IF there was even one real bit of any think tying Trump worked with Russia, it WOULD BE FRONT PAGE NEWS, and NON STOP CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NYT, ABC, Coverage!!
Lot's of people running around SCREAMING, WOLF WOLF WOLF, But there's no WOLF to be seen or Found!!
Hillary and the Obama team, are so dirty, and have ton's of stuff connecting them to all of this BULL SHIT!!!!
With the media and feeding frenzy of these types of topics I dont care anymore. Most everyone I know is just saying they vote and now dont even look at the news. A lot of people are burnt out on the issue.
Does anyone really think the average person will ever know?
Who killed JFK?
Is there any “proof” yet???
Of course there is. Don't we all KNOW that the absence of any credible proof just somehow has to be proof? The left just doesn't seem to get the fact that THERE IS NO PROOF!
By the way, "proof" is pretty much a meaningless concept outside of mathematics and logic.
The best you can expect is evidence - shaky, strong, compelling, overwhelming, etc.
As I noted earlier, no one has leaked what evidence Mueller has - but based on the signals sent by his use of subpoenas, indictments, etc., it seems to be leaning toward "overwhelming".
Jehalapeno The Trump administration announced Wednesday that the U.S. will impose tough new trade sanctions on Russia in response to the poisoning and attempted murder of a former Russian spy and his daughter in Britain.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/world/europe/russia-sanctions-ruble.html
Yeah, the Trump admin announced that tough sanctions will be imposed in November or later. The announcement was made after new sanctions bill was introduced by US senators.
So, I think the Trump's intention is clear: to prevent the new bill from being passed and to pool the wool over Americans' eyes before the midterm election.
His entire foreign policy (from sabotaging implementation of CAATSA, decimation of State Department under Tillerson and abandonment of democracy and human rights agenda to countless attacks on US allies and international institutions and undermining America's influence) was beneficial for Putin/Russia. Why will the pattern change?
No proof, and even if he did if it was just to get dirt on skankles its not breaking any law.
