New June Awake with Misleading Statements about Evidence for god (page 2)

stuckinarut2

Typical straw man argument techniques used by the writers....

stuckinarut2 To clarify, used by writers who can't prove their argument with any real evidence, and so must resort to ingenuine ways to get their point across.

I still have a hard time understanding how the person can write that and not have some conflict about it?

I remember going nuts when I was writing a talk for the hall or a convention and stuff did not add up. I usually ended up ditching that point and making one I had some basis for.

OneEyedJoe

And kodos for you OneEyedJoe! Guess you had a CO visit recently?

Nah, it just always stuck out as stupid that they would cite how pleasing variety is as proof of god (or his love, as the case may be) when variety is also direct evidence that the biblical flood account is inaccurate.

That and a lot of species of apples are really grainy and not very good. The variety is equal proof of a loving god as it is proof of an asshole god that tries to trick us by making some of the apples good and some of them gross.

Heaven

Wanting something to be true doesn't mean that it is.

Finkelstein

The WTS has always purposed that to get a true understand of god and of accurate bible interpretation, that one has to learn and be taught "only" by them and them alone.

What this really comes down to it is a self promoting marketing scam, for people to read their literature and and to eventually become a public sales representative in distributing their literature.

Realistically you could say Jehovah's Witnesses are actually dedicated avowed employees for the Watchtower Corporation.

Amen.

New June Awake with Misleading Statements about Evidence for god

stuckinarut2

ttdtt

stuckinarut2 To clarify, used by writers who can't prove their argument with any real evidence, and so must resort to ingenuine ways to get their point across.

I still have a hard time understanding how the person can write that and not have some conflict about it?

I remember going nuts when I was writing a talk for the hall or a convention and stuff did not add up. I usually ended up ditching that point and making one I had some basis for.

OneEyedJoe

Heaven

Finkelstein

ttdtt

Satan

Satan

Crazyguy

xjwsrock

Share this

New June Awake with Misleading Statements about Evidence for god

stuckinarut2 To clarify, used by writers who can't prove their argument with any real evidence, and so must resort to ingenuine ways to get their point across.

I still have a hard time understanding how the person can write that and not have some conflict about it?I remember going nuts when I was writing a talk for the hall or a convention and stuff did not add up. I usually ended up ditching that point and making one I had some basis for.

Share this

I still have a hard time understanding how the person can write that and not have some conflict about it?

I remember going nuts when I was writing a talk for the hall or a convention and stuff did not add up. I usually ended up ditching that point and making one I had some basis for.