Bringing Reproach on Jehovah's Name

by cofty 24 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • cofty
    cofty

    All my JW life I was reminded constantly about the importance of not bringing reproach on Jehovah's name.

    Decisions on whether or not to disfellowship an individual often turned, not on the seriousness of the sin, but on whether the incident was public knowledge and had resulted in bad publicity for the congregation. I recall a middle-aged lady being reported to the elders for shoplifting a sweet worth less than £1- and the elders' insistence that a judicial committee must be formed because the store manager and staff knew that she was a JW (I successfully argued that all she needed was support for her dreadful family life, but that's another story)

    This morning the UK Guardian carries a story that labels Jehovah's Witnesses 'an absolute disgrace' for their refusal to compensate - I suspect the real problem is their refusal to apologise to - the victims of child abuse. A few days ago The Telegraph reported on accusations that the Watchtower is 'selling of assets and moving cash to avoid sex abuse compensation'.

    I can only imagine how odious the name Jehovah has become in Australia.

    As a child the fear of a future period of persecution was used as an effective weapon to suppress any thoughts of disloyalty. Who could have thought that the authorities would actually come after the organisation for protecting pedophiles?

    The excuses for active JWs to cling to the organisation are becoming more tenuous every day.

  • smiddy3
    smiddy3

    Well said cofty.

    The excuses for active JWs to cling to the organisation are becoming more tenuous every day.

  • FatFreek 2005
    FatFreek 2005

    Insightful, Cofty.

  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    They say, in the Guardian

    Jehovah’s Witnesses have responded and will continue to respond directly to individual claims for redress in a caring, fair, and principled manner, taking into consideration the unique circumstances of each claim,” they said in a statement.

    The five groups will be banned from receiving federal funding and could lose tax concessions, including charitable status.”

    ............

    That final sentence is a cracker. Let’s hope

  • stan livedeath
    stan livedeath

    i think the biggest reproach the watchtower cult bring upon their gods name is

    Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses

    FOR SALE.

  • sir82
    sir82
    The five groups will be banned from receiving federal funding and could lose tax concessions, including charitable status.”

    New light alert!

    It's quite amazing how often "new light" is prompted by changes in tax laws or a loss in a court case.

  • Ding
    Ding

    When the organization is hated because of organizational policies and practices, that's categorized as persecution by the world rather than as bringing reproach on the name of Jehovah.

    Massive double standard...

  • truth_b_known
    truth_b_known

    Excellent post Cofty!

    Years ago a dear friend of mine had a mental breakdown of sorts and committed a crime. It was covered by the local news. While in jail awaiting trial he was told that his body of elders conducted a judicial committee and decided to disfellowship him. That's right! He was never contacted ahead of time. Those elders asked his father, an elder in another congregation, deliver the news to him. He was told they had no choice as so many people knew what he did.

    Now the Watchtower neither confirms nor denies claims of child abuse in their organization. They just protect the corporate assets from reparations.

  • Unstuck
    Unstuck

    I say: Go Anne Ruston!!! The Aussie SA senator who is pushing for those institutions who've not joined the National Redress Scheme to have their charity, tax-exemption status removed. I so hope they (the Aussie govt) have the guts to follow through on that threat.

    Take their charity status away!! Although, as I type that, I know full well that that will play into their persecution porn.....

  • Mr.Finkelstein
    Mr.Finkelstein

    I can only imagine how odious the name Jehovah has become in Australia.

    Good point Cofty

    Talk about bringing reproach onto Jehovah's name .

    Silly twits why didn't they just go long with the governmental laws and regulations.

    The JWS leaders (GB) implemented the two witness rule to these unlawful egregious matters in a underling intent of protecting the organization's public image or bring reproach onto Jehovah's chosen earthly organization..

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit