It
really depends on who you debate with, why you debate and the mutual respect
you show one another.
For
instance, one evening, I was talking about the steadfast faith of my mother in
law who refused blood transfusion despite this putting her in greater risk. The
doctor had evaluated this at 2% higher rate of failure and thereby, possible death.
My
ant’s response was that there were no risks to begin with and that the doctor
was inadequate. I tried to reason with her that the doctor had been referred by
the Hospital Liaison Comity (HLC), that they had stayed informed every step of
the way and that there was indeed an risk increase due to refusing blood.
My
ant argued and argued, questioning my faith and motives for layout out the
facts while all I wanted to say is:
Who
has greater faith? The one who does something knowing it is totally safe or the
one that does an action accepting the risks?
Somehow,
she couldn’t see things from that angle and continued arguing.
Moral
of the story? Some people are not worth your time.