Correct me if I am wrong ,the majority of people on this board believe/proved JW`s organization are not honest when they quote sources for their articles in magazines or on their programs on JW.Org
In other words they are biased to only present what they believe validates their belief /agenda promoting their view omitting anything in this same quote that may give an alternative understanding of the subject.
And they justify /rationalize this as Theocratic Warfare ,withholding information from those not worthy of it as being OK.
{ The sin of Omission ?}
And only promoting beliefs /views that support their claims disregarding all other evidence to the conrtary
So why in the world should we trust what they say in regard to anything they say as regards their previous year of so called increases and achievements in their witnessing ?
Edit to add :
The fact that they mislead the R&F JW`s today as to what they believed and taught in their early history was an eye opener for me. That they could be so dishonest about their own early history was a shock to me.