by OrphanCrow 40 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse
As a born in, I know first hand how little that organization cares about the well being of children. For starters, children are never removed from any of the adult subjects that are discussed in their meetings, the only actions they take regarding any abuse towards children is to protect themselves (always) and their crop (maybe).
Children mean nothing to that organization. Not a thing.
Even if this guy is totally reformed (and that is very unlikely) why would he ever be allowed to work with the public in any capacity? You don't put innocent children at risk, you just don't.
And using PTSD as an excuse is pathetic. You are either wired to prefer children sexually or you aren't, no amount of stress will change that. Just like any pedophile, he minimizes and excuses his disgusting behavior.
sir82 - "You want a conversation stopper that has no built-in response in the 'Reasoning' book? Next time a pair of JWs knocks on your door, ask 'so, which one of you is the child molester?'"
Damn, that's a mic-dropper.
I swear, if every in-the-know householder responded with that zinger, the D2D ministry would be revamped quicker than you could say "Warwick". :smirk:
One of the pedo's in the hall I went to was a baptized JW when the rap of an 8 year old occurred, Oh wait he also served in the military and was some huge big shot he calmed, he would go on and on and on in his comments at the meeting about his military life, and also 'he did't really do the crime he only took the rap for his son as he did't want his son to have to go to prison. This is what one of the prominent in elder's in the hall told me and this elder said that it was commendable, just really missed placed thinking because this showed how much this baptized pedo brother loooooved his son, kind of like David and Absalom. Aint that just sweet. I am being sarcastic in case any of you don't get it.
It just makes my blood boil reading this.
Vidiot that would be great question to ask.
Also they let this pedo brother man one of the tables they used at the local bus stop, They said it was OK because there were always at least two other JW's with him.
Here is some info I found. Not too exciting, but you never know what will come of this, so it's good to keep tabs on it now.
According to http://www.homefacts.com/offender-detail/COX00245011020160419/Waymon-Chandler-Ivery.html#.V6pLtHlrUW4.facebook his date of birth is 1/5/1950, his offense date is 12/21/1992, 1st Deg Sexual Assault On A Child, Milwaukee County, Wi # 92cf923464, and he is a registered sex offender.
I don't find him in the Wisconsin sex offender registry. http://offender.doc.state.wi.us/lop/searchbasic.do
I do find him in the Colorado registry. https://www.colorado.gov/apps/cdps/sor/search/search-summary.jsf This has slightly different info than the homefacts.com site:
OUTOFSTATE 1ST DEG SEXUAL ASSAULT ON A CHILD, Milwaukee County, WI # 92CF923464 conviction date: 12-21-1992 Felony Conviction
Here is some info I found.
According to http://www.homefacts.com/offender-detail/COX00245011020160419/Waymon-Chandler-Ivery.html#.V6pLtHlrUW4.facebook , his date of birth is 1/5/1950, his offense date is 12/21/1992, 1st Deg Sexual Assault On A Child, Milwaukee County, Wi # 92cf923464, and he is a registered sex offender.
I don't find him in the Wisconsin sex offender registry. http://offender.doc.state.wi.us/lop/searchbasic.do
I do find him in the Colorado registry. https://www.colorado.gov/apps/cdps/sor/search/search-summary.jsf
This has slightly different info than the homefacts.com site:
OUTOFSTATE 1ST DEG SEXUAL ASSAULT ON A CHILD, Milwaukee County, WI # 92CF923464 conviction date: 12-21-1992 Felony Conviction
So...he is guilty of 1st degree sexual assault on a child in Wisconsin, which means there was either bodily harm or sexual intercourse with this particular child.
Definition of 1st degree sexual assault on a child in Wisconsin: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/02
This is not some creep who likes mature teenagers or went too far with someone whose age was not known to him. There is no way to minimize this crime. He did this with a relative who was 9 years old, and his symbolic, superficial statements to the reporter do not indicate he is reformed.
Also, odds are, this is not his first sexual assault of a child, or possibly his last either. This just happens to be the only one where he got caught and convicted.
Rebel
I have heard that most pedophiles harm at least 10 children but usually only get caught for one child if that.
LITS
Rebel8 = I see no ownership been taken.
I guess it would be more than if he said nothing at all.
This POS did the classic J.W thing Deny then when you are caught out minimize the problem try to blame somebody or something else.
He blamed it on his time in the special forces well i grew up around men who were on the Burma railway they were starved,tortured and beaten by the Japanese they saw their friends die in the most horrible way everyday one man died for every railway sleeper that was layed.
They came home and were told "Thanks for your service to your country you are now dismissed from the Army" No counseling nothing get on with your life.
They saw thing we can not even imagine ...they didn't turn into child rapists.
The WTS has deemed him OK to go from door to door just ask the average householder if they want him coming to their house and i can guess the answer.
one answer one bullet.
Karter
