LMsA As for the London trip, I think it is possible that he’s seeing lawyers to initiate civil proceedings. It is my understanding that British law makes suing someone for defamation and libel a lot easier than in other countries. I believe there are at least two parties he can use this against based on their residency - Marc and Cora Latham and JW Beliefs Discussed
I was thinking this but I didn't want to say anything publicly in case it gave Lloyd ideas! However for JWBD, as we've said before, truth is the best defence. He hasn't mentioned anything Cedars didn't confirm and has gone out of his way to shut down anything connected with the Marco rumours. Cora has said nothing as far as I know. Mark has responded to Lloyds legal threats and possibly made a video responding to Lloyds livestream. I don't think Lloyd has a leg to stand on when it comes to any of that.
Now where he may have some legal recourse is when it comes to the supposed "Marco" sexting messages.
Marc Latham made a short video of himself reporting the so-called 2017 "Marco" sexting messages to the police, due to the claim that the other party was a minor. As far as I know those messages were originally nothing to do with Marc Latham. The only reason he reported them, is that he is resident in the UK where the alleged incident took place.
Aside from truth, another strong defence to defamation is "opinion".
As long as Marc believes those messages were Lloyds (his "opinion"), that Marc himself is not the author of these messages and as long as he is not aware they are fake and has therefore maliciously reported them, he is protected in law. As far as I can tell (I'm no expert!) Marc's friend Kim Brookes passed him what she claimed was proof of a criminal act. As long as he did so in good faith, it's not unreasonable for Marc to report it. Whether he should have done so publicly is another matter but I still don't believe it's defamation given the circumstances.