JeffT
30 minutes ago
I can't remember if I posted anything on that thread, and I'm too tired at the moment to read through the whole thing. However, in general, I've been trying to offer up some clarity on the meaning of all these big awards against the watchtower.
I was looking for your name in that thread but I didn’t see it. There were a few names that popped up - particularly a 14000 (not exact number) username who also seemed quite knowledgeable.
It astounds me. I am not an accountant and horrible at maths and would defer to an accountant on accountancy matters - even taxation law.
This 14000 appeared to have quite sound legal knowledge and has some sort of legal background, I would guess a lawyer based on the level of knowledge.
Lloyd placated him initially and then started attacking him when he continued to raise legal facts about Lloyd’s article. Wow!
I find it particularly interesting that he couched his comments in “we are having a conversation” and “I’m open to criticism” ….. and then when the questions and comments got to hard to answer and he realised that he had erred, he attacked.
The more I learn about lloyd the less I understand how he got to where he did and why people continued to accept his “facts” as gospel 🤷♀️