An addition to my previous posts showing that "scholar" is in no sense his self-proclaimed namesake:
In addition to the thorough foul-ups that "scholar" has made with respect to the information given in the reference works he suggested that I look at, namely, The Chicago Manual of Style and A Manual for Writers, his putrid quoting style is repudiated by the third reference he gave: The SBL Handbook of Style states (Hendrickson Publishers, 1999, (3rd printing-March 2003) p. 40) (SBL stands for Society of Biblical Literature):
Authors are responsible for supplying complete, accurate, and stylistically correct notes and bibliographies... For books using the traditional format, complete publication data should be supplied in the first note referring to a given source...
As a general rule the sequence of publishing information (that given inside parentheses in a note) is as follows: editor; translator; number of volumes; edition; series; city; publisher; date.
The fact that "scholar" failed to give complete and accurate information regarding the particular edition of Crisis of Conscience that he was quoting from is positive proof -- according to him -- that he is incompetent.
AlanF