Christians will never say anything about what a 'spiritual' or 'glorified' body is.
On the one hand they insist that he still has his resurrected physical body but as soon as you explore the implications of that they retreat into sophistry.
If Jesus body consists of flesh and bones, as Vander says, then we can't avoid the fact that flesh is sustained by a process of cellular respiration. Oxygen and glycogen is carried to the cells by blood. Glycogen is broken down into ATP molecules which fuels the cell's activity.
If there is glycogen there is food. If there is food there is digestion. If there is digestion there is defecation.
If the christian wants to avoid the spectre of a god who takes time out his busy day to go to the toilet he needs to assert that a 'spiritual' or 'glorified' body is somehow different in some unspecified way. But consider how different.
If a body does not require cellular respiration fuelled by ATP then it has no use for - lungs, a heart, a vascular system, kidneys, a bladder or a penis, an esophagus, a stomach, an intestinal tract including large bowel, small bowel, rectum or anus, a liver, a gallbladder or bone marrow.
More than that he would not need any of the DNA associated with all of these parts or the parts of the brain that control them. Even at a cellular level his body would be unrecognisable compared with a human body and would be absent of mitochondria.
So tell me again please. How exactly can you claim that Jesus retained his human body?