I personally am asserting NOTHING.
What I am doing is trying to see if other people are saying SOMETHING.
I think what starts these "CONSPIRACIES" is the dodgy disposition of Bill Gates.
His interviews about Epstein, for instance. And his responses just aren't easily believable by
about half the country.
_______
Conspiracies develop around a certain Billionaire named Bill Gates largely because
he plays dumb about simple questions.
For instance, when asked directly about MICROCHIP implants in vaccinations.
Say what?
Let's go to the Smithsonian magazine's article in 2019.
Quote:
"The tattoo technology, described today in the journal Science Translational Medicine, is still in the early stages of development and hasn’t yet been tested in humans. But the team’s experiments in rats suggest that these medical marks are both safe and long-lasting, and can be administered alongside vaccines without compromising efficacy."
Notice this next paragraph:
Quote:
"Backed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, interviews in Malawi, Bangladesh, Benin,
and Kenya will begin early next year.(2020)
“We want people to be comfortable,” says study author Kevin McHugh, a bioengineer at Rice University.
“The goal is widespread adoption.”
_______
Okaaaaay.
Sounds like the poor people in Africa are going to be a test case.
What else should we know?
Quote in Smithsonian mag:
"From there, reading the dots becomes a lot like scanning a QR code. Though invisible to the naked eye, dots stamped onto pieces of pig and human skin lit up in clear patterns—a circle, rectangle or cross—when viewed through a smartphone fitted with an infrared filter, the team found."
The TITLE of this article has a tagline:
"But technology raises several ethical concerns that could stymie its progress".
Ya think?
As a result of these "ethical concerns," a poll was published demonstrating who was concerned and how many.
Yahoo Poll in May of 2020: Are concerned about ethics
Republicans = 44%
Democrats = 19%
Independants = 24%
______________________________43% Dems + Independants
_______
RICE UNIVERSITY called these "Quantum Dot Tattoos"
IBM called them "Electronic Documents"
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation paid for and patented it.
So here is where the CONSPIRACY THEORIES began:
Nora O'Donnell asks Gates:
"Do you want a vaccine so you can put microchips into people?"
Triggering this response from Bill Gates:
"No - there's no connection between any of these vaccines and any
tracking type thing at all. I don't know where that came from."
Make of that what you will.
Saying "any of these vaccines" contradicts the vaccinations in Africa - doesn't it?
Or am I missing something?
I'm sure those who want to use these issues to score political points and create a
Boogeyman are thrilled by this controversy.
When asked about the claim, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation told Reuters,
“The reference to “digital certificates” relates to efforts to create an
open-source digital platform with the goal of expanding access to safe, home-based testing.”
IBM describes a digital certificate as an “electronic document” used to identify an individual,
And associate the identity with a public key. Like a driver’s license or a passport, it provides proof of a person’s identity (here).
See where it says (here)?
That “link” does NOT exist.
---The requested page does not exist or might have moved.---
On that same Web Page is a link to RICE UNIVERSITY’s Web Page :
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/spiky-patch-could-invisibly-record-vaccination-history-under-skin-180973809/
There is a “There” there - but who knows how innocent? I think that margin of “WHO KNOWS?” is enough to scare certain people who don’t trust Gates for other (Epstein) reasons.
That’s my research. Draw your own conclusions.
Is this an electronic SHIBBOLETH in the long run?
Stay tuned…
Conclusion?
“There are plenty of reasons why patients might hesitate to sign on to such an unusual procedure. One of the biggest issues, Lee says, involves privacy, something that’s already a hot-button topic in the realm of health records. Carrying medical information on the body—even in a form that’s “invisible” without a special filter—could invite stigma, discrimination, or worse. You want to advance science. But you also want to be mindful of the potential impact that science might have.”
And Kendall Hoyt, a biosecurity expert at Dartmouth College’s Geisel School of Medicine, warned that the idea of administering tattoos might not be well received. Potential patients could reject the procedure out of fear or mistrust. They may worry that authorities are using the patches to “encrypt” information onto individuals. She notes that:
“Given the nature of these issues, the team’s tattoos could end up widening the chasm between patients and health providers, both foreign and local. If communication about the product isn’t initiated early. I worry about the unintended consequences. It could make things worse than they already are.” Kendall Hoyt, PhD
In October 2019 Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who, together with his wife, runs the richest and most powerful foundation in the world, co-organized a simulation exercise on a worldwide corona epidemic. Videos were posted documenting the exercise. But intriguingly Gates now denies such an exercise ever took place.
Why? On April 12, 2020, Bill Gates said in an interview to the BBC, “Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.”
This is the same person who, just six months before the outbreak of the pandemic, organized a series of four role-playing simulations of a corona pandemic with very high-ranking participants. Event 201 was a simulation of a corona pandemic conducted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, and Johns Hopkins University in October 2019.
_____________
THAT'S ALL I HAVE MANAGED TO PULL TOGETHER.
Bread crumbs or just overlapping coincidences? Who knows? I don't.
_______
My favorite DEBUNKER, Jon Stewart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDf42hoHvrs
