Article: Jehovah's Witnesses lose court fight to obtain abuse inquiry report before victims

by Tahoe 15 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • Tahoe
    Tahoe

    Jehovah's Witnesses have tried - and failed - to get an advance copy of the Abuse in Care Inquiry's final report into their church.

    The Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Australasia (CCJWA) filed an urgent claim in the High Court in Auckland on 21 June to obtain a copy of the final case study relating to the religious denomination in the inquiry's report, but the claim was dismissed.

    It also unsuccessfully sought all relevant underlying documents supporting the case study.

    In a separate case, the Jehovah's Witnesses also filed for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court after the Court of Appeal dismissed an earlier bid to avoid the scrutiny of the inquiry altogether.

    RNZ understands the CCJWA received and commented on a draft copy of the case study in May, but has yet to see a final draft.

    If its High Court claim had been successful, it could have led to the church receiving a copy before the government or abuse survivors had read the report.

    Jehovah's Witnesses is the only religious group to take legal action against the Commission.

    It has taken similar action against public inquiries overseas, including in Australia and the United Kingdom.

    In a statement, a Jehovah's Witnesses spokesperson said it had no choice but to go to court.

    "We are in full agreement with the inquiry's objective to protect children but have serious concerns about the accuracy of the report regarding Jehovah's Witnesses.

    "Child protection is of utmost concern to Jehovah's Witnesses and we believe the people of New Zealand, its decision-makers and most importantly survivors, deserve to be presented with accurate information. We have no choice but to resort to court to address these issues."

    The inquiry is due to hand its final report to the Governor-General on Wednesday, wrapping up six years of work.

    After that, it will be passed to Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden, who must table the report in Parliament before it is made public.

    That was expected to happen in the week beginning 22 July.

    Survivors of Church Abuse New Zealand spokesperson and former Jehovah's Witnesses elder Shayne Mechen said former Jehovah's Witnesses members and survivors had been angered by the new court action.

    "They are feeling angry and frustrated because it shows they [the church] don't care."

    Survivors and former members had warned the Commission the church would be litigious, he said.

    "They are desperate to protect their name but it shows very little care for any victims, not only of the Jehovah's Witness faith, but of other faith-based organisations because none of them will be getting the final report until July."

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/520393/jehovah-s-witnesses-lose-court-fight-to-obtain-abuse-inquiry-report-before-victims

  • FragrantAddendum
  • Biahi
    Biahi

    I would love to see that, FrangrantAddendum!

  • Beth Sarim
    Beth Sarim

    There goes the watchtower ..

    You never know. You never know.

  • karter
    karter

    I live in New Zealand and can tell them about many C.S.A cases.

    1 Elder a child rapest.

    1 M.S C.S.A with his 3 sisters.

    Many more.

    Karter

  • NotFormer
    NotFormer

    Did a bit of online searching regarding The Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Australasia (I'll probably post something later about the article itself)

    The ASIC* register lists them as CHRISTIAN CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES (AUSTRALASIA) LIMITED, Type: Australian Public Company, Limited By Guarantee. Locality of registered office: DENHAM COURT NSW 2565.

    Limited by Guarantee is a company type common for non-profits**.

    I did a similar search on the New Zealand Companies Office website, but there doesn't seem to be any such entity or subsidiary listed.

    It looks like New Zealand's JW operation is governed by the office in Denham Court (is that Sydney Bethel's address?).

    So the New Zealand inquiry is being handled by the Australian branch as far as I can tell. I wonder who the legal team is. Do they have any loyal JW barristers in New Zealand? Or here in Australia, for that matter.

    No smoking gun in this post. Just exercising a bit of curiosity.

    *Australian Securities and Investments Commission

    ** A for-profit company would probably be Limited by Shares. And should the WT need that sort of structure, they'd probably choose a private company (Proprietary Limited) over a public (Limited) company.

  • karter
    karter

    Notformer , They closed the N.Z Bethell a few years ago now all handled out of Australia.

    The Legal team is a "Kings council" employed by the J.Ws at $1000 nzd an hour plus his side kid at im guessing $700 an hour add the $8000 a day for the high court and it adds up to plenty.

    Karter.

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    Thanks karter,

    Evidently even a K.C. finds it hard to defend the indefensible, but it shows the desperation of the Org. the fact they are employing one, they so want to whitewash the shit covered wall that is now their Public facing one, but that may well be impossible.

    This sort of case may well have a "Barbara Streisand Effect", I do hope so.

  • NotFormer
    NotFormer

    karter, did the closing of their own branch upset the NZ dubs? I can just imagine the bean counters in NY saying: "We'll close the branch in NZ and make great savings by operating the NZ "work" out of the Australian branch. It doesn't make any difference; it's all the same, anyway!"*

    I have had a few friends from NZ over the years and I can imagine how much that attitude would piss them off.

    *For those playing along at home, NZ was separated out from under the NSW colony in 1840 and became a colony in its own right. It was invited to the talks about forming the Commonwealth of Australia in the 1890s but decided to remain its own country.

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    You gotta ask yourself at this point…

    …just how deluded/desperate are they if they’re willing to pick fights they haven’t a prayer of winning, all over the world, all at the same time?

    Just how deep does the Watchtower’s CSA rabbit hole go?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit