by You Know 29 Replies latest jw friends
You Know,
I'll take a stab at refuting your arguements. Here it is...Why on earth would ANYONE beleive that the WTBTS or the Governing Body, or Jehovah's Witnesses in general are in anyway God's organization or that the scripture in Isaiah in anyway applies to the JW's?
Yeru
YERUSALYIM
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Shakespere: Hamlet
2 points, You Know.
Note that very few people are anti-Jehovah, it is the monkeys, not the organ-grinder that are irritating to ex-witnesses.
You refer to the WT's haughtiness. Are you aware what the pot said to the kettle?
Englishman.
To Seeker:
A revealing comment, You Know.
It was meant to be. / You Know
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! ROTFLMOL PMP!
What a crackpot. Hmmm. Let's see. The JW's are mostly brain dead ...
And it is true that Jehovah's Witnesses greatly respect such and offer the Watchtower more-or-less unquestioning acceptance of their authority to determine for them what is God's truth. So, in a sense the Watchtower organization could be seen as an idol, in that it stands in the place of God in the hearts and minds of some, or even most, of Jehovah's so-called Witnesses.
And thus are (probably) going to die in this great 'colapse' that will happen in 1998, er 1999, err 2000, err "Real Soon Now".
So I guess once the money is all worthless and the System Ends(TM), it will just be you left huh? Since all the evil non-JW's will have been killed, as will all the evil brain-dead idol-worshipping of the FDS/Gov Body/Org JW's who didn't listen to You (Know).
Why not do us a favor and just start your own cult since You Know so much more than anyone else?
You Know claims:
"No apostate can refute what I have put forth."
Nonsense. Your rantings are continuously refuted. The fact that your drug-induced hypnosis does not allow you to admit it is irrelevant.
Trying to logically debunk your insane ravings is quite doable, but is no more effective in convincing the insane author of his insanity than a logical debunking of the Society's 1917 The Finished Mystery would have convinced C. J. Woodworth that he was nuts, or Rutherford that he never should have published such an insane piece to begin with. Logic and insanity don't mix.
Some false prognosticators have had the sense to get out of the business, like when William Miller gave up on making predictions after his 1843/4 prediction of the end of the world failed. Others pick up where the more sensible leave off and keep making false predictions. You obviously haven't the sense, or really, the honesty, to admit that your latest round of predictions is no better than all the rest. Like the rest, they will fail -- Soon Now.
It's obvious that getting on discussion boards like this is for you the spiritual equivalent of humping a plastic blow-up doll.
As for quoting scriptures like "soon the wicked one will be no more" or "soon Jehovah will blah blah blah" -- spare us. What is "soon" when such scriptures -- even if valid -- were written 2500 years ago?
You're the Bozo the Clown of online false prognosticators. When from time to time 'anointed' Bethelites get a load of your rantings, I'm sure they have themselves a good laugh, and reconfirm why the Society pays little attention to 'anointed ones' outside the New York area.
AlanF
Like I said Fraudbacker, "no apostate can refute what I put forth." You wanna give it another try or just be content to leave well enough alone and just let that spittle slowly drool down your chin? / You Know
Hey, Booby, your comments show just how stupid and thoroughly dishonest you are. I explicitly stated that your insanity is debunked continually, and indicated that actually going through a debunking exercise would just be throwing pearls before an insane pig. But I'll throw you a pearl just to demonstrate the truth of my claim, so that readers who haven't yet seen you for the insane frothing-at-the-mouth false prognosticator you are will get to see it for themselves:
The Society's interpretation of Mattew 24:45 as applying to itself is completely wrenched out of context. The verses before and after -- by the Society's own teaching -- apply to a time future from now. Therefore, if there is such a thing as a composite "faithful slave" that some day would be appointed -- which the context proves is a wrong interpretation -- that appointment must be in the future. But because JW leaders claim that Jesus already, in 1919, bestowed this title upon them, then by their own definition of "false prophet" as "someone who teaches falsehoods in God's name", they are false prophets and therefore cannot be leading "God's people". Therefore their claim that Jehovah's Witnesses comprise "God's people" is itself false. Thus your entire maniacal interpretation of Isaiah and Lord knows what else comes tumbling down.
Now, Booby old bean, let's see if you can manage a refutation without including your usual blatant dismissals, my-God-will-kill-you's, and assorted non-answers. But we all know that you can't do it. YOU DON'T KNOW BEANS.
AlanF
slipnslidemaster,
I never get tired of seeing that graphic!!!
It's nearly impossible reasoning with people wearing blinders. You can argue, provide documentation and so forth, but there is none so blind as those who will not see. My little cyber poster shows some false predictions of the Tower, and their "sky is falling" drum beat. The Watchtower's efforts of looking respectable is nutty given the fact they look forward to God murdering all disagreeing with them.
There is little point in arguing with folks like You Know, because like the Watchtower, they see the world as an evil place awaiting God's execution. The sign reflects the obvious, and some simple facts, but obviously You Know can't see it. His profile image of a person with a patch over the eye is only half true--his image should show a blindfold over both eyes.
You are delusional. You have never argued nor provided documentation. You are in fantasyland if you imagine that your little twirling emerald skull and bones is anything other than nonsense. / You Know
The Society's interpretation of Mattew 24:45 as applying to itself is completely wrenched out of context. The verses before and after -- by the Society's own teaching -- apply to a time future from now.
I know. I taught you that some time ago on H2O. But apparently we are going to have to go back over the main points as you seem to have gotten things a bit messed up. There are two appointments Fraudbacker, count them---2. First is when Jesus speaks in the past tense, as in "whom his master APPOINTED over his domestics." That's the first appointment, and it is in the past from the present moment when Christ is speaking during his parousia. The second appointment is in the future. That's why Jesus speaks in the prophecy, as if his presence is already underway, which of course it is at the point when these prophecies become relevant, speaking in the future tense, saying: "Truly I say to you, He WILL APPOINT him over all his belongings." That second apointment is future and awaits the arrival of Christ and the commencement of the judgment period to become fulfilled. / You Know
