Hi there SJ,
I've heard about some of these kings starting the co-rulerships earlier than their OFFICIAL reign. The critical question is whether or not the people back then started numbering the years based upon the co-rulership dating or the official dating of the kingship.
Thus, you are free to believe what you wish, all I needed was your confirmation that his OFFICIAL rulership 15th year was 28-29CE.
With that in mind, this makes those years OPTIONAL for the baptism of the Messiah.
Now as far as the other issues go, I already explained to you Herod died on Shebat 2, 1AD. SORRY NOT NEGOTIABLE.
If you need to argue about this, please explain how an eclipse on March 13/14, just one month before Passover was seen by Herod when he died on Shebat 2, some six weeks BEFORE the eclipse happened? Bottom line is that there is a critical conflict here already recognized by others as being inconsistent with the eclipse Josephus mentions. After checking things out it was clear to me that an alternative date for the death of Herod based upon Josephus was Shebat 2, 1AD. I'm comfortable with that.
GOING BEYOND THAT, it has been confirmed that Jerusalem fell in 529BCE which means the 1st of Cyrus fell in 455BCE thus to fulfill the 483 years Jesus had to appear in 29CE not 27CE. So it's all connected.
If you want to go into ADVANCED chronology, you can date everything via the year the Jews returned to Palestine in 1947 which began their last Jubilee. You just add 49 years to 1947 to get the end of the last 70 weeks which is 1996. Then you just have go go back in time 4 70-week periods (1960 years) to get the end of the first 70 weeks in which Jesus would die at midweek. That means based upon 1947, 1960 years earlier than 1996 was 36CE which means 7 years earlier Jesus should have appeared to be baptized in 29CE. That also means the first 70 weeks would have begun in 455BCE which is the date confirmed by two astronomical texts, the VAT4956 and the SK400.
So you see, it's all lined up and coordinated together; all the chronology.
Thus, since you've confirmed that Tiberius did have his sole rule which dated his 15th year in 28-29CE, there is no conflict with the Biblical chronology.
Sooooo....
Everything is fine...and
You don't know what you're talkinga about as usual, which is quite typical of the false prophet you are and continue to be.
I suggest you stop listening to demons and start paying more attention to scripture.
Cheerio,
LG