"It’s my experience that, yes, it has changed. Elders are quick to seek legal advice from the branch at even a hint that an incident could be ‘trouble’… I believe they will be told to report it anonymously if WT Legal deems it reportable…”
"Um…
…that doesn’t sound like a change.
That sounds like business as usual."
Indeed! When WT advice becomes: "call the police before you inform the elders," or "don't even involve the elders ", and they completely rescind the two witnesses rule, and admit that involving the police doesn't amount to "taking your brother to court", then, maybe then, we can say that policy has changed.
If the organisation is still the first port of call (informing the elders or the branch before anyone else) then they have not learned a gosh-darned thing.
There's still a whole system wide culture built up around this stuff that needs to be dismantled. If there are not two witnesses, a JW can still be disfellowshipped for slander if they try to warn other JWs about predators.
Tell me what's changed.