Just like warning labels, I like to think that every rule change has a story behind it.
What if one of the GB members suddenly needed blood?
by StarTrekAngel 16 Replies latest watchtower bible
-
schnell
And hey, it's not like we can all lie in a statement to the court, right?
-
aintenoughwiskey
They would newlight the sh1t out of that old legacy lunacy. I think we are going to see some long held doctrines newlighted in the coming months. They would love to bury the blood doctrine.
-
OnTheWayOut
Who is to say whether a GB member has ever had blood or not? They just would not tell anyone.
-
Wild_Thing
If a Governing Body member needed blood, they would make sure he died and make a martyr out of him. His picture would be blasted on all of their literature praising him for being loyal to Jehovah. They would use it to guilt their members into unquestioningly accept their blood policy.
-
Village Idiot
What if one of the GB members suddenly needed blood?
Hopefully he'll catch an exotic disease like Creutzfeldt-Jakob (The human version of Mad Cow disease). I heard that no test can screen that out.
-
redpilltwice
They could take blood and call it "overlapping fractions".