Big Pharma knew, the vaccine was damaging hearts in young people and damaging life span in others.

by liam 19 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • liam
    liam

    Executive order signed this morning. Prescription Drugs reduced by 30-80 percent. Investigation by DOGE found out that other nations that were paying $100 dollars for a certain drug, Americas were paying $1000 dollars or more for the same drug.

    Big Pharma has been ripping the American people for years.

    This Executive order will save close to a Trillion dollars a year a via Medicare and Medicaid and illegals use of the programs.

    I know many people who are paying $1500 for certain drugs on monthly basis. This executive order will help them.

    When Covid Vaccines started, Pfizer knew within 3 months that 1225 Young people’s hearts were being damaged for life, plus had caused the death of several young people. They had warnings from the Israeli Ministry and also a Pediatric Group, and this information was sent all the way to Biden. But the Biden administration, rather than telling the American People what was happening to those taking the vaccine, choose to downplay the danger of the vaccine and proceeded to use Tik Tok and YouTube influencers to encourage the young people to continue to take the vaccine.Some influencers were getting up to $30,000 dollars a minute to encourage taking the vaccine.

    What is also being found out is that some of the people who took the vaccine, and have experience no problems, are now experiencing some problems with kidney and heart failure. The vaccine may have some “Delayed” fatal effects, several years after the injection, depending on age, health, etc. We will see as the years go by what delayed effect it will have on those who took the vaccine and as of yet not suffered any effects. Remember also that there is no possibility of lawsuits, if your husband or wife dies because of delayed effects of the vaccines, because they were given immunity from lawsuits.

    The Democrats have threaten to file a lawsuit to stop Trump from interfering in drug prices. I don’t think there’s anything they can really do about it.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfC0ZCfVTf4

  • blondie
  • joey jojo
    joey jojo
    investigation by DOGE found out that other nations that were paying $100 dollars for a certain drug, Americas were paying $1000 dollars or more for the same drug.

    In America, pharma supplies is a free market, they can charge what they want to the everyday person. Those companies petitioned Trump to place a tariff on Australia because they are unhappy they cant charge us what they can charge American citizens.

    Just for reference, Americans pay the most for medicine - as a proportion of GDP than any developed country, yet have the lowest life expectancy of any developed country.

  • ballistic
    ballistic

    I've not seen this but as devils advocate, what if you took out "Australia" and put in say, "Kenya" wouldn't it become more apparent why every country pays a different price? See it might also not just be affordability of certain drugs, but also there may be other drugs to treat the same condition are available in a given country.

  • ballistic
    ballistic

    This is the table currently on that page you quoted:

    Branded DrugAustraliaUSACanadaFranceUKSouth AfricaPortugalSwedenFinlandMexico
    Viagra$38.70$2,771.36$115.62$287.76$12.77$12.81$40.83$41.27$46.88$18.99
    Lyrica$16.62$648.87$72.30$25.62$12.77$16.15$20.12$73.68$20.70$130.93
    Lipitor$14.12$1,761.02$101.15$4.27$12.77$1.73$3.55$28.25$21.66$24.99
    Ventolin$20.12$33.42$78.72$8.31$12.77$2.14$6.74$6.16$4.21$25.00
    Zithromax$5.16$103.55$68.41$8.00$12.77$7.04$6.23$8.31$10.22$5.63
    Lantus$21.17$77.16$185.95$41.73$12.77$6.84$64.10$51.31$35.89
    Prograf$21.17$765.98$116.57$157.13$12.77$205.15$26.11$251.49$240.04$388.99
    Yasmin$18.98$416.38$127.79$0.00*$12.77$5.25$12.30$22.94$37.20$65.99
    Prozac$21.17$1,503.55$120.97$2.39$12.77$2.07$15.17$11.47$6.33$198.68
    Xanax$18.52$96.30$75.81$1.79$1.38$1.22$4.57$1.95
    Zestril$17.35$423.00$81.56$3.46$12.77$1.73$15.37$6.47$4.34$38.99
    Viread$21.17$1,329.44$151.45$245.63$12.77$16.02$735.93$292.46



  • joey jojo
    joey jojo

    From my understanding, the Australian government has a system called the pharmaceutical benefits scheme and buys in bulk from U.S. pharma, effectively acting as a middle man and getting a discount for the sheer amount they buy. That allows them to cap the prices of drugs available to Australians and they are strictly controlled by the health system.

    Not all drugs are on the government pharmaceutical benefits scheme and if they arent, they can be very expensive.

  • Anony Mous
    Anony Mous

    There are multiple effects:

    - The balloon effect - if eg. Australia or the EU does price fixing, the balloon gets squeezed on their end, and bulges on the US end. This is what Trump is trying to avoid by mandating the preferred country - so costs for Australians, Brits and other Europeans are going to increase because we're no longer subsidizing their healthcare (which the US currently does for billions per year).

    - The invention effect - many drugs available in the US are recently invented and not available in other markets, so the average price is high because we are paying thousands for new 'luxury' drugs like Ozempic. Eg chemotherapy used to be such 'luxury' treatment, when rich Americans started treating cancer, it eventually became available everywhere.

    - The cherry picking effect - when news organizations cherry pick data on specific drugs and treatments, you get some weird numbers. However, the US pays lower prices on average for about 80% of drugs (generics) compared to other countries who pay on average more per dose for generics. On the other hand statistics from other countries often do not include private healthcare costs. Eg. in most countries a not insignificant amount of people still requires/desires private health care, which is significantly more expensive than the US (hence why people come TO the US for health tourism and besides some sketchy procedures, nobody goes to Canada or Mexico) and not included in public cost schedules.

    - Simpson's paradox - Most data about medical care needs to be classified in a category and then you can compare categories. Eg. it makes no sense to compare cancer care survival rates and costs if a country like Canada or some EU countries promotes euthanasia as a cost reduced option but does not consider it an adverse effect. So if you're aggregating 20% of treatments that aren't available in other countries, aggregating dissimilar data and make sweeping statements, you end up with huge errors.

  • Bribie
    Bribie

    Big Pharma undertook the worlds largest clinical trial in history!

    Millions of people stepped up to be human guinea pigs and putting their complete trust in science and what governments were telling them to do. One elder told me it was the right thing to do because we must obey government authority when it does not conflict with Bible direction. I completely disagreed and did not participate. Which was a contrarian view that was not popular at the time.

    Apparently the vaccines needed to be made available at warp speed - yet these vaccines were experimental and in hindsight we know they had extremely dangerous side effects!

    Would God through the GB endorse these vaccines?

    Well I will let others answer that in their own way.

  • joey jojo
    joey jojo

    Anony Mous
    so costs for Australians, Brits and other Europeans are going to increase because we're no longer subsidizing their healthcare (which the US currently does for billions per year).

    Care to elaborate? As far as I know, the PBS costs US tax payers nothing - it has nothing to do with the US government. Its a system the Ausralian government has for buying drugs direct from pharmacuetical companies. It is subsidised by the Australian government (Australian taxpayers) - not the US.

  • Anony Mous
    Anony Mous

    @joey: I described the balloon effect. If your government sets a price that is unrealistically low then those costs are eaten by inflating the price in the US.

    Say it costs $100 to manufacture the drug but a socialist government says, nah, we will only pay $20, then you have the choice of not selling at all and ceding the market and likely get penalized on other transactions by said government, or you can sell the $20 and redistribute the $80 cost to your other customers. However now other socialist systems do the same and more and more of the cost gets subsidized by non-socialist countries. You squeeze the balloon on one end, it must bulge somewhere else.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit