Article - New Zealand: Jehovah's Witnesses lose last ditch court case over abuse in care report

by AndersonsInfo 22 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • AndersonsInfo
    AndersonsInfo

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/522908/jehovah-s-witnesses-lose-last-ditch-court-case-over-abuse-in-care-report?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1g3qVZxlojO2SzcM6Xlsf2tsC_0REhD4dP4I6rDA6zxAFPLc_v2hZVvf4_aem_PztGhHVTf5To8QsJTv3m0g

    JULY 23, 2024

    Jehovah's Witnesses lose last ditch court case over abuse in care report

    Jehovah's Witnesses have failed in an eleventh hour attempt to block part of a lengthy report about abuse in care that is about them.

    Recommendations from a report into abuse that occurred in state and faith-based care will be made public on Wednesday.

    On Friday, the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Australasia filed for interim orders in the Court of Appeal to prevent part of the report about them from being published until their Supreme Court appeal is decided.

    They filed to avoid scrutiny altogether.

    They asked that part of the final report, a case study on Jehovah's Witnesses, not be published on the Royal Commission's website, that it be kept confidential and not reported on.

    Justice Cooke declined the application in a judgement released on Tuesday, citing "considerable public interest" in the report and the fact they had waited till the "very last moment".

    He also said the chances of their success in the Supreme Court "must be regarded as low".

    Justice Cooke noted no affidavit evidence was filed by the Jehovah's Witnesses in support of the application.

    "We nevertheless accept that the appellant has a position to preserve," he said.

    "Publicising the section of the report dealing with the issue of abuse by members of the Jehovah's Witnesses faith will likely have a reputational impact on the appellant, and the faith more generally."

    He said any subsequent decision of the Supreme Court concluding that it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Royal Commission to make such findings may mitigate that impact, but would not eliminate it.

    "Having said that, we do not understand there to be a dispute that the Royal Commission received evidence of abuse engaged in by members of the Jehovah's Witnesses faith," Cooke said.

    "The appellant's argument in this proceeding has been limited to arguing that the Royal Commission does not have jurisdiction to investigate and report on that abuse because it did not take place in a relevant "care" setting.

    "But we nevertheless accept that the proposed order can be seen as necessary to preserve the appellant's position."

    A spokesperson for the Australasian Branch of Jehovah's Witnesses said in a statement: "We have serious concerns about the accuracy of the report regarding Jehovah's Witnesses and have no choice but to resort to court to address these issues. READ MORE

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/522908/jehovah-s-witnesses-lose-last-ditch-court-case-over-abuse-in-care-report?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1g3qVZxlojO2SzcM6Xlsf2tsC_0REhD4dP4I6rDA6zxAFPLc_v2hZVvf4_aem_PztGhHVTf5To8QsJTv3m0g

  • AndersonsInfo
  • DesirousOfChange
    DesirousOfChange

    I think they are foolish in pushing the matter so publicly and I believe it will result in the "Streisand Effect" bringing even greater attention to them and CSA.

  • TonusOH
    TonusOH

    My mother loves to use Luke 8:17 when some scandal rocks another religion. "For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open."

    I wonder if she will apply it to the WTS in this case...

  • JW GoneBad
    JW GoneBad

    I wonder what it's costing WT to appeal this case...is a WT flunky lawyer involved or did WT source out the appeal proceedings to a pricy appeal specialist attorney? Either way it's going to cost WT & JWs in more ways than one. According to Justice Cooke the proceedings are for sure going to result in unwanted notoriety to the cult organization:

    "Publicising the section of the report dealing with the issue of abuse by members of the Jehovah's Witnesses faith will likely have a reputational impact on the appellant, and the faith more generally."

    Thank you Barbara and Joe for the link.

  • DesirousOfChange
    DesirousOfChange
    I wonder what it's costing WT to appeal this case...is a WT flunky lawyer involved or did WT source out the appeal proceedings to a pricy appeal specialist attorney?

    This is mostly just "pushing paper" which here (USA) a paralegal would perform. I would think British HQ and even Australia HQ have a lawyer to turn to for things like this. Since there is little risk of any kind of CO$T (no monetary award), I cannot see WT paying for outside counsel.

  • karter
    karter

    Jw gone bad, I live in New Zealand and the lawyer they hired was a "Kings council" at NZD$1000 an hour about $650 USD plus his side kicks.

    To go to the high court is about $10.000NZD a day.

    They were orded to pay costs to the crown for their appeal

    My guess is this has cost them the thick end of 1 million dollars.

    Nothing to hide nothing to fear but they have hidden plenty.

    Just what i can tell them is enough to a a few guys locked up for a long time.

    Karter.

  • FedUpJW
    FedUpJW

    Cue the whining about "persecution" in three . . . two . . .

  • blondie
    blondie
    JW GoneBadan hour ago

    I wonder what it's costing WT to appeal this case...is a WT flunky lawyer involved or did WT source out the appeal proceedings to a pricy appeal specialist attorney?

    Yes, the WTS prices these out to non-jw lawyers, the WTS wants to win especially wants people who will see the "legal" aspects, not the moral, ethical, or spiritual side of things. WTS = Pharisees

  • DesirousOfChange
    DesirousOfChange

    Karter -- thanks for correcting my false assumption. Seems WTS isn't so tight fisted when defending themselves. (Just ask the brothers for more money!)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit