Atta Trained in Baghdad????

by Yerusalyim 11 Replies latest social current

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    This report has been in the british press, not picked up here in the states though...if true it's VERY interesting.


    WND
    DAY OF INFAMY 2001
    Memo: 9-11 chief
    trained by Saddam

    Document says Atta in Baghdad under Abu Nidal's tutelage just before attacks

    Posted: December 13, 2003
    8:05 p.m. Eastern

    © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

    Mohammed Atta, the hijacker believed to be the mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, was trained in Baghdad by Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal, claims Iraq's coalition government.


    Mohamed el Amir Atta

    The leaders says a handwritten secret memo to Saddam Hussein gives details of a visit by Atta to the Iraqi capital in the summer of 2001, just weeks before the attacks, reports the London Telegraph.

    "We are uncovering evidence all the time of Saddam's involvement with al-Qaida," said Dr Ayad Allawi, a member of Iraq's ruling seven-man presidential committee, according to the London paper.

    "But this is the most compelling piece of evidence that we have found so far," he said. "It shows that not only did Saddam have contacts with al-Qaida, he had contact with those responsible for the September 11 attacks."

    The memo, obtained exclusively by the Telegraph, was written by Tahir Jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, the former head of the Iraqi Intelligence Service.

    Dated July 1, 2001, it outlines a three-day "work program" for Atta at Abu Nidal's base in Baghdad, the Telegraph said. Abu Nidal, headquartered in Baghdad for more than 20 years, was responsible for the failed assassination of the Israeli ambassador to London in 1982.

    Habbush, according to the memo, says Atta "displayed extraordinary effort" and demonstrated his ability to lead the team that would be "responsible for attacking the targets that we have agreed to destroy," the Telegraph reported.

    The paper said the memo's second part, titled "Niger Shipment," has a report on an unspecified shipment believed to be uranium. The memo says it had been transported to Iraq via Libya and Syria.

    Allawi insists the document is genuine, although Iraqi officials refuse to disclose how they obtained it.

    The Telegraph noted although Atta is known to have resided in Florida in the summer of 2001, intelligence experts believe he easily could have slipped out of the U.S. because he was known to have used more than a dozen aliases.

    Abu Nidal died in August 2002. Arab intelligence sources dispute the official Iraqi version of his death ? that he committed suicide after his arrest by Iraqi agents.

    The sources said Abu Nidal, or Sabri Al Bana, was killed by Iraqi agents in his Baghdad office several days before his death was reported Aug. 19.

    The news about the memo comes after the New York Times reported a former Iraqi intelligence officer has denied claims he met with Atta in Prague.

    Ahmad Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani spoke with interrogators after he was taken into U.S. custody in July.

    U.S. officials caution Ani might have lied to interrogators about the meeting, the Times said.

    Czech officials initially confirmed reports an Iraqi spy had met with Atta in Prague. But the CIA and FBI have not corroborated them.

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    BTTT

  • Double Edge
    Double Edge

    Wow... it's going to be interesting to see how that plays out. Of course, you realize that if this board continues on for twenty years, there are going to be some people then posting that September 11th never really happened.

  • imallgrowedup
    imallgrowedup

    Yeru -

    Now that Saddam has been captured, I hope more and more people who have evidence against him will no longer fear bringing it to light. I may be wrong, and I will admit if if I'm not, but I honestly believe we are going to find the connection between the terrorist training camp with the American airplane found in Iraq, and Al Qaeda. I know there will be some who would not welcome that information, but I hope enough will to keep the "false pretenses" arguments down to a dull roar.

    growedup

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    Well, I've already heard a few people on the left say that even if WMD are found...even if it's actual Nukes...we still had no reason to go to war.

  • LucidSky
    LucidSky
    Well, I've already heard a few people on the left say that even if WMD are found...even if it's actual Nukes...we still had no reason to go to war.

    Problem is we didn't go to war based on THAT information. If something terrible finally does turn up, this becomes a forgiveable offense. But at this point we're crossing our fingers and HOPING - not a great demonstration of "preemptive" justice.

    Lucid

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    Lucid,

    The ultimate Reason given for going to war with Iraq was that Saddam was in violation of the ceasefire agreement. No one argues the fact that he was. Is the world a better place with Saddam gone? Are the Iraqi people better off with Saddam gone? Is the world safer with Saddam gone? The answer to all three is a resounding YES!

  • freeman
    freeman

    What you have here is some interesting tidbit that is useful in painting a composite picture; however I wouldn?t hang my hat on it alone, it?s easy to get burned that way.

  • Yerusalyim
    Yerusalyim

    freeman,

  • freeman
    freeman

    What you have here is some interesting tidbit that is useful in painting a composite picture; however I wouldn?t hang my hat on it alone, it?s easy to get burned that way. Yure they have already uncovered silkworm missiles modified to carry the nerve agent Sarin. This modified missile is by definition a WMD. Granted this information was originally released as part of a classified report, however it?s my understanding that it is now also available from non classified sources too. My question is why do we not read about this, why is this not big news? I think you know the answers as well as I do.

    You can point things out but just don?t expect that much to get through the bias filter, you are fighting against strongly held ideologies that don?t require facts, and are almost impossible to overcome using facts.

    Freeman

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit