Woman Refuses Blood Transfusion--Attacked by Son--Is He Guilty of Murder

by blondie 20 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • blondie
    blondie

    http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/local/scn-sa-nor.arraignment2jan03,0,1830775.story?coll=stam-news-local-headlines

    Man arrested in mother's murder on suicide watch

    By Martin B. Cassidy
    Staff Writer

    January 3, 2004

    The Greenwich man arrested Thursday morning in connection with the fatal stabbing of his mother on New Year's Eve has been placed on suicide watch by a state Superior Court judge and will receive medication for bipolar disorder while incarcerated.

    Stephen Ferenz, 42, was arraigned yesterday at state Superior Court in Stamford on two counts of first-degree assault of a person over 60 in connection with the stabbing and subsequent death of his mother, Carol Ferenz, 63, at their home at 14 Walker Court.

    Prosecutors in the case are considering whether to charge Ferenz with homicide, but must factor in his mother's refusal to have blood transfusions, in keeping with her faith as a Jehovah's Witness, they said.

    "Those charges definitely need to be considered," Supervisory Assistant State's Attorney James Bernardi said after the hearing.

    Unshaven and dressed in a white jumpsuit, Ferenz did not speak during the hearing.

    Carol Ferenz had been installing a new computer with her other son, John Ferenz of Danbury, when Stephen Ferenz stabbed her multiple times in the chest and arms, Bernardi, the prosecutor in the case, told State Superior Court Judge James Bingham.

    "The defendant came into the room and appeared to be jostling with his mother," Bernardi said. "His brother than realized his mother had been stabbed."

    Ferenz, who lived with his parents and sister, stopped taking prescribed medication for bipolar disorder about two weeks ago, after which his behavior and mental state deteriorated, Bernardi told the judge. Bipolar disorder, also known as manic depression, is a condition marked by wide mood swings, ranging from elation to deep depression.

    Public Defender Susan Hankins asked that Ferenz receive a prescription issued by a psychiatrist who examined him after the attack.

    "Along with the bipolar disorder, there are issues of depression and medication," she said.

    Bernardi told the judge he was trying to decide whether homicide charges, such as manslaughter or murder, are warranted in the case. Carol Ferenz had refused what could have been life-saving blood transfusions, in accordance with her faith as a Jehovah's Witness, he said.

    "Apparently she was conscious and alert," Bernardi said. "We need to decide whether homicide charges should be filed."

    Carol Ferenz was taken to Greenwich Hospital and later to Westchester Medical Center in Valhalla, N.Y., for treatment, Greenwich police said. She died at 12:20 a.m. Thursday, police said.

    "We'll probably have to speak to the doctors," Bernardi said. "She indicated both to the medical technicians and at the hospital that before receiving a blood transfusion she had to check with the elders of her faith."

    Andrew Ferenz, who identified himself as the husband of the victim, confirmed that his wife turned down a transfusion.

    "She looked the doctor in the eye and said 'no transfusion, no blood,' " Ferenz said yesterday.

    Police said they filed the assault charges because the medical examiner has not classified the death, including whether it was a homicide. The Westchester County Medical Examiner said her death was caused by blood loss due to stab wounds, police said.

    A public affairs spokesman at the Jehovah's Witnesses' world headquarters in Brooklyn Heights, N.Y., referred questions about the faith's ban on blood transfusions to the organization's public affairs Web site at www.jw-media.org.

    According to the Web site, Jehovah's Witnesses are required to refuse blood transfusions for religious reasons. This requirement is based on several biblical passages, including Acts 15:29, which orders Christians to abstain from blood, as well as the "meat of strangled animals."

    George Pawlush, a spokesman for Greenwich Hospital, said patients can decide to reject a potentially life-saving treatment.

    "Greenwich Hospital has policies with regard to patient rights," Pawlush said. "One of the patients' rights is . . . to make health care decisions in collaboration with their doctor. This includes whether to accept or reject proposed treatments."

    Andrew Ferenz said "no way" should his son be charged with homicide. He said his son has been on medication for 25 years.

    "When he does go off of it, he can't control himself," Ferenz said. "This is the only time he got violent."

    Ferenz added: "He doesn't know what he's doing. He needs help."

    Bingham ordered Stephen Ferenz held on $1 million bond at Bridgeport Community Correctional Center. He is scheduled to appear Jan. 13 in state Superior Court for a discussion of the charges against him.

    -- The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Copyright © 2003, Southern Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.

  • Stacy Smith
    Stacy Smith

    Well of course he'd be guilty, in my mind anyway. Just because a person refuses a medical treatment doesn't mean you have the right to stick them with a knife and expect to not be arrested for murder.

    Yea I know there are circumstances but, he's a bad man regardless of his medical problems and I'd be happy to see him off the streets.

  • Euphemism
    Euphemism

    Whether he's guilty or not due to his mental health, I don't know. He'll have to have a proper psychiatric examination, etc.

    But I definitely don't think that his mother's refusal of a blood transfusion exonerates him from liability for her death. Legally, a murderer need not have intended to kill a person; they only need have intended to inflict gross bodily harm. And I think that stabbing definitely qualifies.

  • blondie
    blondie

    Yes, this issue came up a few years ago in California, where a drunk driver injured a sister who eventually died after refusing a blood transfusion.

    Here's an interesting dicussion of that.

    http://www.positiveatheism.org/mail/eml9928.htm

  • Guest 77
    Guest 77

    Blondie, "The State owns us?" Interesting reading and comments. I'm a strong believer in personal choices. I respect peoples choices no matter what the outcome. The last contributor said, "The whole point, though, is that she did not cause her fatal condition." One contributor said, how do know if the blood did not cause 'adverse' reaction.'

    Question, if an acquaintance got into a life and death situation and he/she told me that they totally believed in blood transfusions, I would inform the doctors. Now, my friend dies, who's responsible, the doctor, me or the donor? Should I have kept my mouth shut? It's a tennis type topic. Ah, but who gets the final blame?

    The State owns us?

    Guest 77

  • darkuncle29
    darkuncle29

    OK people, bear with me, I'm a little dense.

    Which series of events fits this story?

    Woman refuses blood------>He stabs her (why? havinga manic episode?)--------> D.A. debates what charge he should get.

    OR

    Bi-polar guy goes bersek on woman and stabs her--------->SHE refuses blood transfusion and dies----->D.A. debates.....

    Given the title of the thread...

    Re: Woman Refuses Blood Transfusion--Attacked by Son--Is He Guilty of Murder

    ...it would seem the first series of events happened. That doesn't make much sense.

    In the grander scheme of things, it doesn't really matter.

    As for how he should be charged: He commited a violent act upon her person that resulted in her death. He chose to stop taking his meds. Even in the midst of mania, HE chose to attack her. Only HE is responsible for his actions and emotions.

    Peace

  • Xena
    Xena

    Well unless she asked to be stabbed to death....he's guilty of murder. Personally I think most JW's when they refuse blood are still thinking at the back of their mind that their God is going to save them for their loyal stand....perhaps I just don't understand the mindset of a martyr.

    Darkuncle looks to me like she refused the blood first for a terminal illness...then he stabbed her. And I agree..the "I decided not to take my meds and oooppps look I killed someone" excuse doesn't fly with me either.

  • Kenneson
    Kenneson

    I wonder if the son is a J.W. and how the elders will deal with this problem if he is. Disfellowshipping I'm sure.

  • kls
    kls

    Well the way i see it, no she did not ask to get stabbed but she may have lived having a transfusion.So the son would not be charged with murder .She may of had a chance to live ,but chose to die .It was her decission to have the final answer of life or death.

  • Xena
    Xena

    kls,

    My mom died from terminal cancer. Being a dub she would have refused a blood transfusion. Actually at the end she refused any more medical treatment and wanted to stay home to die.....

    so if someone had broken into her home and killed her prior to her actually dying...taken away from me and mine those few precious days we had left with her...

    would you consider that murder?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit