There's really nothing in your records other than publishing stuff unless you've been dealt with judicially
Oh, & I s'pose the elders are always right, judicially, they're infallible.
Most of the records I've seen have been pretty shoddy, generally you can barely tell what happened. Guys are too lazy to take good notes. The summary letter is typically pretty brief, not much detail. JT is quite correct, it depends on who you're dealing with. Clued up guys are a little more concerned about confidentiality because they've been warned of possible legal consequences if they violate ecclesiastical confidence, many have forgotten that instruction.Pork chop, are'nt you a woman? How did you get access to cong. records?abeyance.