Bush, Religion, Jw's

by joannadandy 14 Replies latest social current

  • tabarugonzo
    tabarugonzo

    All of you have no idea what you are talking about. JW have always been a non-profit organization who only survive on voluntary contributions. This has been proven time and time again. Today religious organizations are taxed because they profit greatly off of the contributions that are made (sometimes mandatory contributions). JW are not taxed by the IRS because the work that they do is all voluntary and so are the contributions. The IRS has confirmed this time and time again. This also means that no one profits at all. Can you say that about other organizations? This just shows that they really are doing their work out of love for God and his word.

    So why would you think that they would accept money from the Devil himself? They could easily get rich like other religions. If they haven't done it yet, why would they do it now.

  • Amazing
    Amazing

    The Watchtower Society already gets government funding in Italy. If a religion is recognized, approved, and registered with the Italian government, they get part of a religious subsidy right along with the Roman Catholic Church. The Watchtower has enjoyed dipping their hand into the coffers with the Catholic Church for many years now ... were President Bush able to get such funding through Congress, and he may, then I have no doubt that the Watchtower Society would find a way to justify sharing in such a subsidy. - Jim W.

  • Satans little helper
    Satans little helper

    All of you have no idea what you are talking about. JW have always been a non-profit organization who only survive on voluntary contributions. This has been proven time and time again. Today religious organizations are taxed because they profit greatly off of the contributions that are made (sometimes mandatory contributions). JW are not taxed by the IRS because the work that they do is all voluntary and so are the contributions. The IRS has confirmed this time and time again. This also means that no one profits at all. Can you say that about other organizations? This just shows that they really are doing their work out of love for God and his word.

    So why would you think that they would accept money from the Devil himself? They could easily get rich like other religions. If they haven't done it yet, why would they do it now.

    Don't know very much do you? They own hundreds of millions in property and are particularly wealthy. You don't think that Brooklyn addresses come cheap do you?

  • ColdRedRain
    ColdRedRain

    Personally, in my opinion, George W. Bush and his faith-based initiatives disgust me.

    He allows his personal belief in Jeezus Khrist to influence his political actions, which thereby affect others who are not Christian. He states unequivocally that God is with the United States of America and the war on Iraq is just. Previously, he supported a ban on stem-cell research because of his Christian views. Currently, he is pushing money through Congress for the church as Joanna mentioned and he is also pushing over a billion through to encourage marriage among youth.

    His visit to the grave of Martin Luther King is a publicity stunt no more disgusting than his gratuitious landing on the aircraft carrier in military uniform despite never serving (unless you count going AWOL in the Texas Air National Guard), and his granting money for marriage is designed to court neo-conservative right wingers who oppose abortion (despite it's legality since Roe v Wade) and gay unions, or individuals living together without marriage. Convenient that he embraces such legislation in an election year.

    I hate that man. I hate everything he stands for. That is no secret. Just my 2 cents.

    Thanks for letting me vent.

    Presidents have visited the grave of MLK since the days of Reagan. It's a tradition amongst presidents.

    As for god being with the USA, what's wrong with giving a trite phrase about god being with you? It's not unconstitutional to say that, considering that how our declaration of independence mentions god many times. Roe Vs Wade wasn't legal for all women, it was just legal for Jane Roe, who in a funny turn of events, became an anti-abortion activist.

    BTW, neoconservatives wouldn't frown on gay marriage. Neocons are usually socially libertarian and fiscally conservative. (Sorta like me.)

    You hate the man because he's a Christian conservative? Well that's what he's paid to be. He was elected to be one. (And before you bring up the "rigging" of the 2000 vote, look at this map to show where the people's intent were when they voted, Gore only captured the big cities, the same thing that tryants in previous democracies did.)

    You're a bigot against anybody who's white, southern and conservative. Nothing more. I won't take that back...

    Oh, btw, look at these religions that are getting public funding. The Salvation Army, Catholic Charities, etc. You know where I was because they didn't get federal funding!? Out on the fucking streets.

  • Cicatrix
    Cicatrix

    No doubt the Ministry School would be labelled an education service. Afterall, it is "equivalent to receiving a college education":)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit