Why I Believe the Bible, A Nuclear Scientist Tells His Story

by VM44 22 Replies latest jw friends

  • VM44
    VM44

    From Awake!, January 22, 2004, Pages 19-23.
    "Why I Believe the Bible - A Nuclear Scientist Tells His Story"
    Read how a nuclear physicist reconciled his knowledge of science with his belief in the Bible.

    -- Page 19

    Why I Believe the Bible A Nuclear Scientist Tells His Story

    As told by Alton Williams

    In 1978 two significant events took place in my life. In September I received my degree as a nuclear physicist, and in December, I was ordained as a minister of Jehovah's Witnesses.

    When people learn that I am a scientist as well as a Witness, they often wonder how I reconcile my scientific knowledge with my belief in the Bible. Granted, for years I too wondered whether scientific knowledge and belief in the Bible could go together. Eventually, though, I became fully convinced that the Bible is in harmony with scientific fact. How did I reach that conclusion? Please allow me first to relate how I became a scientist.

    A 19-Year Project

    I was born in 1953 in Jackson, Mississippi, U.S.A., the third of 11 children. Our family was poor. We often had to move from one house to another because my parents could not pay the rent. We received most of what we ate through a government food-subsidy program, and the secondhand clothing we wore was given to us by people for whom my mother cleaned houses and offices.

    My parents often reminded us children that the only way out of poverty was to get a good education. As a result, at a very early age, I set my mind on obtaining a college degree. I started school at the age of six, and I continued my schooling without interruption for the next 19 years. I enjoyed science and mathematics, so once I entered college, I began to pursue a career as a scientist.

    -- Page 20

    While in college, I met a young woman named Del. A science professor had referred her to me so Del could get some help with a science course she was taking. Soon, though, our conversations went beyond science, and we fell in love. We were married on January 10, 1974--during a two-hour interval between classes! Four years later, in 1978, I finally received my doctorate.

    I had achieved what I thought was the key to success. I was a scientist--and a nuclear physicist at that! With my newly attained degree in theoretical nuclear physics in hand, I could begin to reap the fruitage of my long studies. I was eager to make a name for myself in the scientific arena. In addition, I could now choose a job from among the many lucrative offers made by private companies and government institutions.

    However, a few months later, on December 30, 1978, I took a step that soon proved to have even more influence on my life and future than my newly attained degree. On that date, I symbolized my dedication to Jehovah God through water baptism and thus became one of Jehovah's Witnesses. How did that step come about?

    A Book Sparked My Interest

    In the latter part of 1977, while I was studying at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, two Witnesses knocked on the door of my apartment. I was away. but my wife was at home with our children, a three-year-old and a newborn. Del invited the Witnesses in. After a pleasant conversation, she agreed to have the Witnesses visit her once a week to conduct a Bible study with her.

    When my wife informed me of this arrangement, I immediately opposed her. I didn't mind that she wanted to join a religion but not Jehovah's Witnesses! Actually, I did not know much about the Witnesses, but I had a preconceived idea that they were a strange group that used the Bible to deceive people. So, in an effort to free my wife from what I considered to be the grasp of the Witnesses, I thought that I would use my scientific knowledge to discredit their teachings.

    One week I took a break from my research work at the university and went home to be present during my wife's Bible study. However, I arrived home later than I had planned, and the woman conducting the Bible study was about to leave. She gave me a book entitled Did Man Get Here by Evolution or by Creation?* Also, she told my wife that during the Bible study scheduled for the following week, they would consider a Bible prophecy showing that 1914 was a significant year. That was exactly the opening I needed! I told the Witness that I would be at home for the next Bible discussion. I wanted to check the mathematical accuracy of what she was going to discuss about the year 1914.

    That same night I began reading the book that the Witness had left. Frankly, the contents impressed me. It was written in a logical manner, and it contained numerous scientific references concerning the subject of evolution. To my surprise, I learned that the Bible contains much more exact information regarding creation than I had previously realized. I finished examining the book in a few days and had to admit that what the Bible actually states about creation does not contradict the known scientific facts concerning life on earth.
    -----
    * Published by Jehovah's Witnesses but now out of print.

    -- Page 21.

    Determined to Find Inconsistencies

    Nevertheless, I was still skeptical about the teachings of the Witnesses, and I was looking forward to doing a mathematical check of the Bible prophecy concerning the year 1914. I thought that this approach would no doubt intimidate the Witness and, hopefully, help my wife to see the error of the beliefs taught by the Witnesses.

    The following week the Witness returned accompanied by a man who was one of the elders in the local congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses. The elder conducted the Bible study. He considered the prophecies found in chapters 4 and 9 of the Bible book of Daniel, concerning the appearance of Jesus as Messiah and King. My mind was set on finding mathematical inconsistencies in the presentation, but I found none. On the contrary, I was again impressed by the logic of the information contained in the Bible.

    Up to that point, I thought that faith in God was based more on emotion than on reason. How wrong I was! I thanked the Witnesses for the informative discussion and said that I would like to continue participating in the weekly study. So from then on, I continued my studies at the university and, together with my wife, my Bible studies with the Witnesses. Also, my wife and I began to attend the meetings of the Witnesses held at the Kingdom Hall.

    Within a few months, I learned many new Bible truths and soon qualified to join the Witnesses in the door-to-door ministry. This I did even though I was in the final stages of earning my doctorate at the university, which absorbed a great deal of my time. I finished my dissertation in the summer of 1978 and moved to the state of Alabama, where I began teaching physics at the Alabama A. & M. University in Huntsville. We quickly contacted the Witnesses in our new locality, and an elder and his wife continued to study the Bible with us. A few months later, my wife and I were baptized, both on the same day.

    Active as a Scientist and a Minister

    For me, being a scientist has proved to be compatible with being a Witness of Jehovah. In 1983, I began working as an astrophysicist at the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center of NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), also in Huntsville.* I worked in both the experimental and the theoretical fields associated with an X-ray telescope. (In 1999 that telescope--the Chandra X-ray Observatory--was successfully launched into orbit by the space shuttle Columbia.) I enjoyed working on that project, which involved the analyzing of X-rays emitted from various stars and galaxies in an attempt to understand the physical universe better.

    My work was doubly enjoyable to me because not only was I working
    -----
    * NASA is a U.S. government organization that functions independently from other government agencies.

    -- Page 22.

    on a scientfically challenging problem but I was also coming to a deeper appreciation of the power and wisdom of the Creator. In fact, Jehovah's words through the ancient prophet Isaiah took on special meaning for me. The Creator says: "Raise your eyes high up and see. Who has created these things? It is the One who is bringing forth the army of them even by number, all of whom he calls even by name. Due to the abundance of dynamic energy, he also being vigorous in power, not one of them is missing." (Isaiah 40:26) The more I 'raised my eyes high up' to peer at the vastness, the
    complexity, and the beauty of the universe, the more I appreciated the work of the intelligent Designer who brought all of it about and established the laws that keep it all together.

    During that time, I kept busy publishing new material in scientific journals based on my research in X-ray astrophysics. However, I was also active in the Christian congregation. I served as an elder and spent some 20 hours each month in the public preaching work. Meanwhile, my wife engaged in the Bible education work on a full-time basis.

    After working some four years at NASA, I felt a growing need to volunteer more of my time to help others learn the wonderful truths found in the Bible. But how could I do so? After discussing my desire with my wife and taking the matter to Jehovah in prayer, I realized that I had to make some important decisions.

    Weighty Decisions

    I approached my immediate supervisor at NASA and told him that I wanted to change my workweek from five days to four days. Of course, I would accept a reduced income. I explained to my supervisor that I wanted to spend the other three days of the week in connection with my ministry. My supervisor agreed, although this arrangement was unheard of for scientists at NASA. However, he told me that I needed to talk to his supervisor. I did so and was pleasantly surprised when this upper-level supervisor also agreed with my request. So in September 1987, I began my career as a full-time minister, spending some 90 hours a month in door-to-door preaching and other features of the ministry.

    Later, a supervisor from the Alabama A. & M. University in Huntsville called me. He offered me a teaching position in the physics department. I replied that I would accept the job only if it would enable me to use the bulk of my time for my ministry. I assured him, though, that my activities in the ministry would not detract from the quality of my work in teaching classes. The supervisor agreed. Today, I still teach at that university and also serve as a full-time minister. I even had time to learn Spanish. Presently, my wife and I serve in a Spanish-speaking congregation
    of Jehovah's Witnesses in Huntsville.

    -- Page 23

    Science and Faith

    In my years of doing scientific research, I have never encountered a conflict between a proved scientific fact and a teaching of the Bible. Often, seeming conflicts are caused by a lack of knowledge--either of a scientific teaching or of what the Bible really says. For example, some scientists and others erroneously think that the Bible teaches that plants, animals, and humans all developed on earth within six literal 24-hour days. This would be in conflict with known scientific facts. But the Bible does not teach that. Rather, it reveals that the creative "days" encompass thousands of years.*

    Confusion also arises from the mistaken idea that faith in God is merely an emotional experience. Far from that, faith in God and the Bible is based on facts that can be verified. As defined in the Bible, "faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for, the evident demonstration [or, "convincing evidence," footnote] of realities though not beheld." (Hebrews 11:1) Yes, faith is based on evidence. Hundreds of prophecies have been fulfilled in the past and in our day. Thus, even applying the scientific method used by all scientists to establish a scientific theory, we can have complete confidence in the fulfillment of Bible prophecies that pertain to future events.

    One such prophecy includes the promise that we will be able to enjoy Paradise conditions on earth in the near future. The devastating effects of old age, sickness, death, wars, and injustice will be no more. (Revelation 21:3,4) Then we will have time to explore and study in detail the wonderful creations of Jehovah God and the many laws that he established to govern this awe-inspiring physical universe.

    I am grateful to Jehovah God for helping me to find the key to true happiness--the wonderful truths found in his Word, the Bible. It is my prayer that still many others, including scientists, may find that precious key.
    -----
    * See chapter 6, "An Ancient Creation Record--Can You Trust It?," in the book Is There a Creator
    Who Cares About You?
    published by Jehovah's Witnesses.

  • Euphemism
    Euphemism

    Thanks for posting that, VM44! It's interesting to watch the Witnesses at work with the same ol' propaganda.

    My parents often reminded us children that the only way out of poverty was to get a good education. As a result, at a very early age, I set my mind on obtaining a college degree.

    A goal, of course, that would have been considered 'untheocratic' if he had been raised a Witness.

    I could begin to reap the fruitage of my long studies. I was eager to make a name for myself in the scientific arena.

    The Watchtower always implies that scientists or academics are motivated solely by 'making a name for themselves.' Was Dr Williams really motivated solely by a desire for prominence? I doubt that someone could get a doctorate at the rather young age of 25 without a genuine love of science and knowledge.

    I could now choose a job from among the many lucrative
    How much of a braggart do you have to be to refer to your own job offers as 'lucrative'? But of course, that's a Watchtower term... every educated or prominent Witness is supposed to have left behind "lucrative" job offers.
    She gave me a book entitled Did Man Get Here by Evolution or by Creation?*
    * Published by Jehovah's Witnesses but now out of print.

    And of course, one of the main reasons it was taken out of print was because it was full of scientific inaccuracies and errors.

    I was looking forward to doing a mathematical check of the Bible prophecy concerning the year 1914

    He repeats this phrase 'mathematical check' several times. Of course, the problem with the 1914 date isn't the math; it's the history! But apparently it didn't occur to him to check that.

    NASA is a U.S. government organization that functions independently from other government agencies.

    In other words, don't try to bust him on a violation of neutrality!

    I have never encountered a conflict between a proved scientific fact and a teaching of the Bible

    I believe that the word you're looking for is 'proven', Dr. Williams.

    Hundreds of prophecies have been fulfilled in the past and in our day.

    And how many of those "hundreds of prophecies" have you ever bothered to check, Doctor? Especially considering that you didn't even check the most obvious one, 1914.

    Really, this is just sad. What would make an intelligent person like Dr. Williams blind himself to the junk science and junk logic of the Watchtower Society?

  • metatron
    metatron

    Did this "nuclear scientist" ever hear about radioactive decay constants?

    Did he ever reason that the "thousands of years" needed for Bible chronology

    contradicts this simple fundamental of modern physics? Did he reason that it's

    the Watchtower's responsibility to disprove this strongly held piece of physics

    if they want to preach their junk history?

    You're right - this is junk - junk reasoning, junk science, junk religion

    metatron

  • yxl1
    yxl1
    Nevertheless, I was still skeptical about the teachings of the Witnesses, and I was looking forward to doing a mathematical check of the Bible prophecy concerning the year 1914.

    Proof you can be educated and still be an idiot

  • link
    link

    I must be one of the many who sent e-mail messages to Dr Williams at: [email protected] ,asking these questions.

    My server indicates that the message was delivered but perhaps Armageddon will arrive before his answers.

    link

  • Bonnie_Clyde
    Bonnie_Clyde

    In my years of doing scientific research, I have never encountered a conflict between a proved scientific fact and a teaching of the Bible. Often, seeming conflicts are caused by a lack of knowledge--either of a scientific teaching or of what the Bible really says. For example, some scientists and others erroneously think that the Bible teaches that plants, animals, and humans all developed on earth within six literal 24-hour days. This would be in conflict with known scientific facts. But the Bible does not teach that. Rather, it reveals that the creative "days" encompass thousands of years.*

    Back in 1978 the when this scientist was baptized, the Watchtower still taught that the creative days were 7,000 years long.

    BTW, I believe it was the book "Paradise Lost to Paradise Regained" that taught that the earth has been here for millions of years. The creative days had to do with making the earth fit for human habitation.

  • Amazing
    Amazing

    Hi VM44,

    Excellent article ... but very sad commentary by this man. He made several statements that troubled me, but I could also see that Awake! editors sanitized what he wrote by limiting the article to basic JW generalized teachings. This one made it through though:

    That same night I began reading the book that the Witness had left. Frankly, the contents impressed me. It was written in a logical manner, and it contained numerous scientific references concerning the subject of evolution. To my surprise, I learned that the Bible contains much more exact information regarding creation than I had previously realized. I finished examining the book in a few days and had to admit that what the Bible actually states about creation does not contradict the known scientific facts concerning life on earth.

    This man is either extremely trusting of reference material, or he is extremely lazy. Anyone who does a half-way reasonable review of the references used by this Watchtower book soon realizes it is poorly referenced using mostly science fiction material, or weak publications like Popular Science.

    Being a nuclear physicist does not mean that one also has studied or been taught biology, anthropology, evolution, etc. ... BUT ... it should have at least caused him to check the references used by the Watchtower Society ... had he done so, he would have had serious second thoughts.

    This also caught my notice:

    * Published by Jehovah's Witnesses but now out of print.

    Clearly, if this book were so valueable, it would still be in print.

    I worked in the field of science and engineering for 25 years ... including 17 years in nuclear power engineering ... yet most of those years I was a Jehovah's Witness. I simply did not check the references nor was I versed in biology or evolution ... I wrongly trusted the Watchtower to do good research. If this man ever does the same, he will see what is wrong. Maybe one day a sharp student in one of his classes in Huntsville, Al will question him about these references, and he will then have some serious rethinking to do.

    Oddly enough, while working for Trojan Nuclear Plant, I spent time auditing our vendors in Huntsville, AL. I was already leaving the JW religion at the time. That was the trip where I took opportunity to drive over to see Ray Franz ...

    Jim Whitney

  • Guest 77
    Guest 77


    Amazing, you had the opportunity to visit Ray Franz, what's his take on the Bible?

    Guest 77

  • Gedanken
    Gedanken

    I sent this email:

    Dear Professor Williams,

    It was certainly interesting to read your article in the Januray Awake! magazine. I am left wondering, though, if you applied the same standards to it as to one of your scientific publications? You stated that you had "checked the mathematical accuray [regarding the 1914 date.]" I found that comment slightly puzzling insofar as the 607-1914 chronology is less a matter of mathematics than of history. I wonder if you have read the book "The Gentile Times Reconsidered" in which astronomical, historical and scriptural arguments are applied to this problem. Here is a link to the book at amazon.com

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0914675060/qid=1075129696/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-4494209-6527244?v=glance&s=books

    As a scientist who publishes peer reviewed articles it only seems fair and honest that you consider this material - after all your comments in Awake! stand to affect millions of sincere people, many of whom will be influenced mainly by your elevated status as a scientist and, consequently, may not bother to consider alternative views. That this they may assume that you have done your homework.

    If you have not already considered this material then I do sincerely hope that you will approach this in the same objective manner you might use when preparing a paper for, say, the Physical Review or as did the Beroeans.

    I am also curious what you make of the Society's recent changes of doctrine - that a creative day is no longer 7000 years - this change has not been emphasized and so many Witnesses haven't even realized that there has been a change at all - and that the generation of 1914 is not a literal generation in any normal sense. It seems to me that these two changes essentially negate any significance of the 1914 date.

    Finally, like many I was a teenage witness in the 1970s and actively preached the Society's message that God Himself had promised that the _literal_ generation that had seen 1914 would not pass away (see the masthead of Awake! from those years and up to about 1995). In retrospect Deut. 18 seems to apply. But I wonder if you are aware that Witnesses youths were actively discouraged from seeking higher education because the end was so close? Those that did go to college were often ostracized almost as severely as if they had been disfellowshipped. So severe were the strictures against university education.

  • r51785
    r51785

    Ah yes, once again Mr. Lincoln is proven true,

    "You can fool some of the people all of the time."

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit