Bush lied, people died.
Six,
Again, that's just not true. On what specifically did Bush lie? For a lie to have occured it means Bush would have known the intelligence was wrong and acted on it anyhow...that's just not the case...going all the way back to the first Gulf War, through Clinton, up to the statements by Mr Kay, the intelligence services NOT JUST of the US, but of the UK, France, Germany, Russia, the sources available to the UN....ALL agreed there were WMD. So where's the lie? In fact, Kay said that given the intelligence we had we made the right decision.
As to other parts of that intelligence, i.e. links to terrorist groups (NOT 9-11 specifically...as the US never tried to make that case) there is undeniable proof of that...Kay says that Iraq DID have Ricin, and the Ricin found in the UK can be traced back to Iraq.
So I'm asking you...where is the lie, agreeing that a lie is KNOWING the intelligence was wrong, or even worse, making it up. We know it wasn't made up unless you're ready to say Clinton, the UK, Germany, France, and Russia were all in on it.
The other fun part of all this is that we now see that those countries in the UN most oppossed to the War, France Russia and Germany, along with at least one quite vocal British MP were receiving pay offs from Saddam.
So, what, specifically, was the lie? All the intelligence showed that Iraq possessed WMD...and Kay is saying that even Saddam and his General Staff thought he had them...that only the scientists knew they weren't making them (assumming that their testimony is true). Where and what SPECIFALLY is the lie?
