Take a good look at the April 1, '04 Watchtower, with its garish 'wild beast' on the cover.
Now, wouldn't this be a perfect opportunity to show a picture of the UN building being
destroyed at Armageddon? Wouldn't be a good idea to blast the churches of Christendom
for supporting this Satanic counterfeit Kingdom of God?
But the article simply defines the 'wild beast' as "all political rule". It also is quick
to point out that human governments can serve as "God's minister" , protecting human
rights, "including the right to engage in true worship".
Why is there no picture of the UN building crashing in Divine destruction? Why
is the article's text now so cautious?
Because of YOU!
Because the Society knows it is being watched! Because they know that your letters
and phone calls and internet posts are exposing them to legal and political trouble.
Because they must beg HUMAN AGENCIES for help, and the last thing they need is
some opposer pointing out their rank hypocrisy - to a judge or bureaucrat.
I swear they could generate electricity - from Judge Rutherford spinning in his grave!
Keep 'chipping' away! YOU are winning! THIS IS the only practical way to change
an otherwise heartless religion - by exposing them to merited ridicule and legal trouble.
Your voice - and efforts count!
metatron