Political word for the day: Simulacra

by SixofNine 10 Replies latest social current

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Shaken, but apparently not stirred.

    Yesterday in a Q & A with editors from Detroit area newspapers President Bush said he was "shaken" by reports of abuse of prisoners in US military custody in Iraq. Yet, according to his press secretary this morning, he hasn't even looked at the Taguba Report, the one people around the world are buzzing about in disappointment and outrage and half of Washington seems already to be reading.

    In fact, in this exchange from that Q & A yesterday it wasn't even clear the president knew what the report was ...

    Q: Are you concerned that there was a report completed in February that apparently --

    THE PRESIDENT: I haven't seen --

    Q: -- Myers didn't know about yesterday --

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, if Myers didn't know about it, I didn't know about it. In other words, he's part of the chain -- actually, he's not in the chain of command, but he's a high ranking official. We'll find out.

    Q: The question is, should something causing --

    THE PRESIDENT: I just need to know --

    Q: -- concern, raised eyebrows --

    THE PRESIDENT: Exactly. I think you'll find the investigation started quickly when they found out what was going on. What I need to know is what the investigators concluded.

    From this exchange, the president
    seemed unaware of what the report even was and claimed to believe that he somehow couldn't get a hold of it until it came up through the chain of command.

    The point here isn't that the president is stupid, but that he seems blithely indifferent to what is a huge setback to American goals and standing in the Middle East and indeed throughout the world.

    There's an echo here of his response to the pre-9/11 warnings streaming up through the government bureaucracy. It hasn't landed on his desk yet, with an action plan, so what is he supposed to do? He talked to Rumsfeld who says he's on top of it. So what more can be done?

    This isn't a matter of the aesthetics of leadership. It is another example of how this president is a passive commander-in-chief, how he demands no accountability and, because of that, allows problems to fester and grow. Though this may not be a direct example of it, he also creates a climate tolerant of rule-breaking that seeps down into the ranks of his subordinates, mixing with and reinforcing those other shortcomings.

    The disasters now facing the country in Iraq -- some in slow motion, others by quick violence -- aren't just happening on the president's watch. They are happening in a real sense, really in the deepest sense, because of him -- because of his attention to the simulacra of leadership rather than the real thing, which is more difficult and demanding, both personally and morally.
    -- Josh Marshall

  • xenawarrior
    xenawarrior

    Simulacra? Sounds like some low carb version of baby formula

  • myauntfanny
    myauntfanny

    I think it's an interesting analysis. Did you write it yourself, sixofnine? And did you read Baudrillard's America? I've been interested in this idea of the simulacrum since I read (bits of) that.

  • Corvin
    Corvin

    Simulacra: A very popular new polyester blend used mostly in the manufacturing of EXPRESS clothing.

  • scotsman
    scotsman

    That Baudrillard is an absolute hoot! His snide little thesis on America could equally be written about Europe.

  • Corvin
    Corvin

    [edited by Corvin for stupity content]

  • myauntfanny
    myauntfanny

    Hi scotsman

    I don't Baudrillard all that much. I also thought that book was kind of snide, it irritated me, but I thought that idea about living in the simulacrum was kind of interesting. It spoke to me on a personal level because when I read this idea, it struck me that I was sort of doing that myself at the time I read it. But I think you're right, it could be applied to many countries in Europe. I think he probably just picked America for the dubious fun of irritating us.

  • asleif_dufansdottir
    asleif_dufansdottir

    Oh God No! I thought this was one place I could go without being hunted by such terms as simulacra (we read Baudrillard last semester).

    However, I'm not sure I agree with this

    because of his attention to the simulacra of leadership rather than the real thing (emphasis mine)

    It was my understanding (potentially flawed, of course) that a simulacrum was a supposed 'perfect copy' of something that never existed in reality.

    The example we liked to use was that of such 50's tv shows as "Father Knows Best", etc, which purported to be a realistic copy of "the quintissential American family"...which in reality didn't exist. Same thing for Disneyland...with its portrayal of American life which in reality didn't look like Disneyland at all. They don't steam clean the streets in most American cities every night like they do in Disneyland...i.e. it sets people up for unrealistic expectations and the resulting disappointment.

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine
    Did you write it yourself, sixofnine? And did you read Baudrillard's America?

    No and no. I'll look into it though, you've sparked my interest.

    aslief, here is dictionary.com's take (I love that google has a dictionary link built in) :

    Simulacrum \Sim`u*la"crum\, n.; pl. Simulacra. [L. See Simulate.] A likeness; a semblance; a mock appearance; a sham; -- now usually in a derogatory sense.

    Beneath it nothing but a great simulacrum. --Thackeray.

  • asleif_dufansdottir
    asleif_dufansdottir

    Gee, I happen to have my notes from that on my laptop (I am a goob, I know)... from Baudrillard's Procession of Simulacra

    p. 327

    ?It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality: a hyperreal.?

    ?it is the map that precedes the territory?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit