We all know about how the society has tried its best to avoid taxes. For one, the whole deal with switching over to contributions for literature after Jimmy Swaggart lost his case. And also with providing food at the conventions. How it was left up to us to contribute for the provisions for several years until the whole food arrangement was dissed.
What I'm wondering is why not just accept being taxed. The whole food thing at the convention was a disaster I'm sure for the Society when they switched to donations. It just seems to me that if they had a price for everything, and even if it was taxed, they'd still make a profit. It seems then they wouldn't have to leave it up to luck and they would have control over how much money they make.
So, the question is, what does the Society have to gain by not being taxed?
Any answers?