Iraq - NYTimes Admits Being Duped by Pentagon

by Satanus 12 Replies latest social current

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1228111,00.html

    The New York Times donned sackcloth and ashes again yesterday when its ombudsman said the newspaper had been duped by "the cunning campaign" of those that wanted the world to believe that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.

    Some stories, Daniel Okrent said, "pushed Pentagon assertions so aggressively you could almost sense epaulets on the shoulders of editors". The half-page critique of the newspaper's coverage during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq followed a separate admission signed by "the editors" last week that said the newspaper had not been as "rigorous as it should have been" in questioning Iraqi exiles.

    Mr Okrent said that in the run-up to the invasion, "cloaked government sources ... insinuated themselves and their agendas into prewar cov erage". The newspaper's failure, he said, was institutional. "To anyone who read the paper between September 2002 and June 2003, the impression that Saddam Hussein possessed, or was acquiring, a frightening arsenal of WMD seemed unmistakable."

    Mr Okrent said much of the inaccurate WMD coverage was "inappropriately italicised by lavish front-page display and heavy-breathing headlines". Other stories that had challenged the assertions or tried to put the claims into perspective "were played as quietly as a lullaby".

    In one instance, a story by James Risen - "CIA aides feel pressure in preparing Iraqi reports" - was completed several days before the invasion and "unaccountably" held for week. The report finally appeared three days after the war broke out and was buried on page 10 of the newspaper's second section.

    Many "scoops" based on unsubstantiated revelations have still to be revisited, the ombudsman said.

    Mr Okrent said he hoped the failings would produce not further contrition, but rather "a series of aggressively reported stories detailing the misinformation, disinformation and suspect analysis that led virtually the entire world to believe Hussein had WMD.

    "The aggressive journalism that I long for ... would reveal not just the tactics of those who promoted the WMD stories, but how the Times was used to further their cunning campaign."

    Gosh!

    SS

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    Wow, great find, ss. Here's something to lighten the tone a bit ...

    Heh heh.

  • outnfree
    outnfree

    Wow! Great find, SS!

    (And the pic was great, too! - LOL)

    out

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    Thanks, out. Wonder if i could get a blow up of that pic.

    SS

  • Leolaia
  • Richie
    Richie

    Sorry to show you this again, but you could hardly blame Bush for his stand on WMD's:

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/11/71011/1160385/post.ashx#1160385

    Richie :*)

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    R

    you could hardly blame Bush for his stand on WMD's

    Yah, it wouldn't be fair to blame the mental midget. Let's find somebody bigger.

    SS

  • William Penwell
    William Penwell

    I was disgusted the way most of the American media bought the pentagon explanations with out questions. Before the war the news media should have been questioning everything instead of playing cheerleaders. If they acted objectively, the US would not have got itself in the middle of this quagmire.

    Will

  • frenchbabyface
    frenchbabyface

    step 1)

    step 2)

    step 3) ... Oooops too late !

  • Sirius Dogma
    Sirius Dogma

    I knew I liked the NYT for a reason. Kudos to them for admitting their mistakes. and Great find SS

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit