True? A lot would need to change in our comments and attitudes, surely.False? Let's keep up the rage.....
I think that both can be true, but only in their proper place. What I mean is:
In the context of talking directly to rank-and-file JWs, I think that, in all fairness, the golden rule would have to be applied because many of them don?t deliberately mean to be at fault?they have been misled. It would serve no real purpose to maliciously berate or antagonize the common JW because it would just be a negative experience for everyone.
However, that does not preclude the merits of being able to talk openly among ourselves about the JW religious/organizational system to foster support and solace. People can vent their rage about annoying TV commercials, corrupt political and religious practices, the weather, and so on. So, I think that people should also have the right to vent their frustration and rage about JWs among themselves?or even directly to JWs if done in a duly tactful manner. After all, ?What goes around comes around.?
Open discussion, and even rage, can be a good means of promoting understanding and healing. (As long as it doesn?t involve planning any physical revenge or terror, or anything like that.) There should surely be somewhere (like this forum) to express one?s observations as well as personal feelings without restraint or fear of reprisal. (Remember the saying in Ecclesiastes about ?a time and place for everything under the sun.?)
So, I guess the main thing is not so much whether or not to express negativity, but, rather, to whom, and in what setting. It all boils down to whatever is fair and appropriate.
That?s my $0.02 + whatever the CAD-USD exchange rate is for today.
?SAHS